Steven A. Espinoza, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 18, 2005
01A33715 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 18, 2005)

01A33715

01-18-2005

Steven A. Espinoza, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Steven A. Espinoza v. United States Postal Service

01A33715

January 18, 2005

.

Steven A. Espinoza,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33715

Agency Nos. 4E-800-0241-98; 4E-800-0286-98; 4E-800-0321-98;

and 4E-800-0098-00

Hearing Nos. 320-99-8285X; 320-99-8365X; 320-99-8491X;

and 320-A0-8335X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal in the above-entitled matter. Complainant filed four EEO

complaints alleging that the agency had discriminated against him on

the bases of national origin (Hispanic), sex (male), color (Brown),

disability (chest problems), age (D.O.B. August 16, 1936), and reprisal

for prior EEO activity. Complainant requested hearings before an EEOC

Administrative Judge (AJ) on all four complaints. The complaints were

consolidated and the AJ held a hearing on the matter. Following the

hearing, the AJ issued his decision finding discrimination on one of

complainant's allegations.

The AJ determined that complainant established his prima facie case of

reprisal when the Injury Compensation Specialist authorized 72 hours of

continuation of pay (COP) on August 3, 1998, and the Postmaster refused to

provide it to complainant. The AJ then found that the Postmaster failed

to provide any reason for his action. Therefore, the AJ concluded that

complainant established that the Postmaster retaliated against him solely

on this claim. As remedy, the AJ ordered the agency to pay complainant $

2,000.00 in compensatory damages.<1>

The agency failed to issue a final decision. Here, the agency did not,

within 40 days of its receipt of the AJ's decision, issue any order.

As a result, because of the agency's inaction, the AJ's decision became

the agency's final order by operation of law. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109(i);

MD-110, at 9-3.

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a), all post-hearing factual findings by

an AJ will be upheld if supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Substantial evidence is defined as �such relevant evidence as a reasonable

mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.� Universal

Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951)

(citation omitted). A finding regarding whether or not discriminatory

intent existed is a factual finding. See Pullman-Standard Co. v. Swint,

456 U.S. 273, 293 (1982). An AJ's conclusions of law are subject

to a de novo standard of review, whether or not a hearing was held.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the Administrative Judge's

findings and conclusions.

Pursuant to section 102(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, a

complainant who establishes his or her claim of unlawful discrimination

may receive, in addition to equitable remedies, compensatory damages

for past and future pecuniary losses (i.e., out of pocket expenses)

and non-pecuniary losses (e.g., pain and suffering, mental anguish).

42 U.S.C. � 1981a(b)(3). The Commission finds that the AJ properly

determined that complainant established a nexus between the alleged harm

and discrimination. Upon review, we find that the AJ appropriately

determined that complainant incurred these losses due to the

discriminatory action and that he is entitled to an award.

We must also review whether or not the AJ's award of non-pecuniary damages

is appropriate. The AJ determined that complainant was entitled to $

2,000 based on the agency's retaliatory actions. The AJ indicated that

complainant did not proffer evidence allocating causation of his emotional

distress between the four complaints, however, the AJ determined that

some of the harm experienced by complainant was attributable to the

Postmaster's refusal to approve the 72 hours. Upon review, we find

that this award is supported by the substantial evidence of the record

and is consistent with case precedent. See Amaro v. United States

Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 01A30313 (December 12, 2003) (awarding $

3,500 where complainant and his wife stated that he experienced anxiety,

depression, nausea, weight loss and gain, diarrhea, chest pain, insomnia,

lack of concentration, irritability, loss of enjoyment of life, an

injured reputation and marital strain, however, not all of the evidence

submitted was related to the issues for which discrimination was found,

and some predated the incidents in question); Resnick v. Department of

Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20040 (October 30, 2003) (awarding

$ 2,000 where other factors, in addition to unlawful retaliation, were

shown to have also contributed to complainant's condition).

ORDER

The agency shall, to the extent it has not done so already, pay

complainant $ 2,000.00 in compensatory damages. The agency shall complete

this action within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date on which

the decision becomes final.

POSTING ORDER (G0900)

The agency is ordered to post at its Post Office in Alamosa, Colorado,

copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being

signed by the agency's duly authorized representative, shall be posted

by the agency within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, and shall remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days,

in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are

customarily posted. The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that

said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

The original signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer

at the address cited in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the

Commission's Decision," within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration

of the posting period.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 18, 2005

__________________

Date

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An agency of the United States Government

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission, dated , which

found that a violation of the Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of

1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.; the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq.; and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee

or applicant for employment because of the person's RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or DISABILITY with respect to hiring, firing,

promotion, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of

employment.

The United States Postal Service, Alamosa, Colorado Post Office, supports

and will comply with such Federal law and will not take action against

individuals because they have exercised their rights under law.

The United States Postal Service, Alamosa, Colorado Post Office, has been

ordered to remedy a former employee affected by the Commission's finding

that he was discriminated against because of his prior EEO activity.

As a remedy for the discrimination, the United States Postal Service,

Alamosa, Colorado Post Office shall provide the affected employee with

compensatory damages. The United States Postal Service, Alamosa,

Colorado Post Office, will ensure that officials responsible for

personnel decisions and terms and conditions of employment will abide

by the requirements of all Federal equal employment opportunity laws.

The United States Postal Service, Alamosa, Colorado Post Office,, will

not in any manner restrain, interfere, coerce, or retaliate against

any individual who exercises his or her right to oppose practices made

unlawful by, or who participates in proceedings pursuant to, Federal

equal employment opportunity law.

________________________

Date Posted: ________________

Posting Expires: _____________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614

1Complainant's representative was not an attorney, therefore, attorney

fees were not awarded by the AJ.