0520120087
04-17-2012
Stephen L. Scheidel, Complainant, v. Sheila C. Bair, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.
Stephen L. Scheidel,
Complainant,
v.
Sheila C. Bair,
Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Agency.
Request No. 0520120087
Appeal No. 0120111964
Agency No. FDICEO-11-004
DENIAL
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Stephen L. Scheidel v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, EEOC Appeal No. 0120111964 (October 17, 2011). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).
Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of race (Caucasian) when it dissuaded him from applying for a Loan Review Specialist position because the Agency barred the hiring of anyone with a felony conviction. In our previous decision, the Commission affirmed the Agency's dismissal of Complainant's claim on the basis that it failed to state a claim. Specifically, the Commission determined that Complainant's complaint failed to state a claim because he has a felony conviction, and federal statutes prohibit the Agency from hiring anyone with a felony conviction.
In his request for reconsideration, Complainant contends that the Agency is violating civil service regulations by barring persons with felony convictions from employment with the Agency. Complainant contends that the bar also illegally discourages people with felony convictions from seeking employment with the Agency. However, as noted in our previous decision, 12 U.S.C. � 1822(f)(4)(E) and 29 C.F.R. � 336.4, are exceptions to general civil service regulations and specifically prohibit the Agency from employing anyone with a felony conviction. Consequently, our previous decision properly found that Complainant's complaint failed to state a claim.
We remind Complainant that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17; e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120111964 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the
request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
April 17, 2012
Date
2
0520120087
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0520120087