Stacey L. Broaddus, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 13, 2008
0120080564 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 13, 2008)

0120080564

03-13-2008

Stacey L. Broaddus, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Stacey L. Broaddus,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080564

Agency No. 076016902122

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated October 16, 2007, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of sex (female) when:

1. a coworker (CW: male) sexually harassed complainant by using vulgar

language, inappropriate physical contact, and by exposing himself to

complainant.

The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, on the

grounds that the agency took prompt and appropriate corrective action.

We note, however, that such immediate and appropriate action goes to

the agency's liability for the harassment, see 29 C.F.R. � 1604.11(d),

not to the issue of whether or not complainant has stated a claim.

Furthermore, it is not clear from the record whether the agency did,

in fact, take prompt and appropriate action. The record contains a copy

of an electronic message sent to complainant on November 26, 2007 which

states only that a military board recommended that CW be removed from the

agency, but there is no record evidence that such removal ever occurred,

and if so, when it occurred. Nor does the record reveal whether CW

and complainant worked in close proximity and whether management took

immediate action to remove CW from complainant's workspace once notified

of her allegations against him. In this regard we note that the FAD

states that management was notified of the harassment on May 15, 2007,

while the military board did not meet to hear the matter until sometime1

between October 17, 2007 and November 26, 2007.

Complainant's allegations against CW include claims that he subjected

her to vulgar sexual language, physical touching, and that he exposed

himself to her. In considering whether any of the above actions, whether

individually or collectively, constitute harassment, the Commission

notes that in Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993), the

Supreme Court reaffirmed the holding of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson,

477 U.S. 57 (1986), that harassment is actionable if it is sufficiently

severe or pervasive that it results in an alteration of the conditions

of the complainant's employment. See EEOC Notice No. 915.002 (March 8,

1994), Enforcement Guidance on Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. at 3.

To establish a claim of harassment a complainant must show that: (1)

he belongs to a statutorily protected class; (2) he was subjected to

unwelcome verbal or physical conduct involving the protected class;

(3) the harassment complained of was based on the statutorily protected

class; (4) the harassment had the purpose or effect of unreasonably

interfering with his work performance and/or creating an intimidating,

hostile, or offensive work environment; and (5) there is a basis for

imputing liability to the employer. See McCleod v. Social Security

Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01963810 (August 5, 1999) (citing Henson

v. City of Dundee, 682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982).

The Commission finds that complainant's allegations state a claim of

sexual harassment. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is reversed. The complaint is hereby remanded

to the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision

and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 13, 2008

__________________

Date

1 The record contains a copy of an electronic message dated October 17,

2007 notifying complainant that the hearing was to be conducted in the

future, and another message dated November 26, 2007 notifying her that

the hearing had concluded.

??

??

??

??

2

0120080564

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120080564