Sprecher et al.v.Sprecher et al. V. Ghilardi et al.Download PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesApr 6, 201011551337 (B.P.A.I. Apr. 6, 2010) Copy Citation BoxInterferences@uspto.gov Paper 63 Telephone: 571-272-4683 ENTERED: 6 April 2010 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Patent Interference No. 105,723 GENENTECH, INC., a subsidiary of Roche Holdings, Inc. (11/548,639), Junior Party, v. ZYMOGENETICS, INC. (7,495,080 and 7,521,537), Senior Party. Before: RICHARD E. SCHAFER, RICHARD TORCZON, and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Bd.R. 127(b) on request The junior party (Genentech) has conveyed through counsel to a paralegal specialist of the board its intent to concede priority and its preference that judgment be entered. Accordingly— Interference No. 105,723 Page 2 Judgment is ENTERED AGAINST Genentech for count 1, the sole count;1 and Claims 22-27, 29-31, 41, and 50-56 of Genentech's involved 11/548,639 application are FINALLY REFUSED.2 A copy of this judgment will be entered in the administrative records of the involved patents and the involved application. cc: K. Shannon Mrksich, BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, P.C., of Chicago, Illinois, with Eric J. Baude, BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE, P.C., of Ann Arbor, Michigan Michael J. Wise, PERKINS COIE LLP, of Los Angeles, California; and Patrick D. Morris, PERKINS COIE LLP, of San Francisco, California 1 Paper 1 (Declaration) at 3. 2 35 U.S.C. 135(a). Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation