SnapTrack, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

May 29, 2001

No. 75548099 (T.T.A.B. May. 29, 2001)

10/3/01
Paper No. 11
TJQ

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
________

In re SnapTrack, Inc.
________

Serial No. 75/548,099
_______

Request for Reconsideration
________

Lori M. Stockton, Lori N. Boatright and Michael W. Hicks of
Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman for applicant.

James A. Rauen, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office
103 (Michael Hamilton, Managing Attorney).
_______

Before Simms, Cissel and Quinn, Administrative Trademark
Judges.

Opinion by Quinn, Administrative Trademark Judge:

The Board has fully considered applicant’s arguments.1
The request for reconsideration is denied.

1 The final paragraph in the request for reconsideration is not quite
understood:
Applicant conversely submits there is and has
always been a distinction between the different
marks SMARTSERVER and SMARTSERV and SMARTSERVE
ONLINE and submits without recognizing and
addressing the same, neither the Examining
Attorney nor the Board has considered the
commercial impressions of the Applicant
conversely submits there is and has always been
a distinction between the different words
“outdoors” and “outdoor” and submits without
THIS DISPOSITION
IS NOT CITABLE AS PRECEDENT
OF THE T.T.A.B.

recognizing and addressing the same, neither
the Examining Attorney nor the Board has
considered the mark for which registration is
sought, to say nothing of considering the
descriptiveness thereof.
A portion of the paragraph apparently relates to a different appeal,
application Serial No. 75/711,655, also handled by applicant’s counsel.