Sheryl L. Harrison, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 24, 1999
05980640 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 24, 1999)

05980640

06-24-1999

Sheryl L. Harrison, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Sheryl L. Harrison v. United States Postal Service

05980640

June 24, 1999

Sheryl L. Harrison, )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05980640

v. ) Appeal No. 01961272

) Agency No. 4-G-770-1735-94

William J. Henderson, ) Hearing No. 330-95-8091X

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST TO RECONSIDER

On April 6, 1998, the United States Postal Service (hereinafter

referred to as the agency) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Sheryl L. Harrison v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster

General, United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01961272

(March 4, 1998). EEOC regulations provide that the Commissioners

may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision.

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting reconsideration must submit

written argument or evidence which tends to establish one or more of

the following three criteria: new and material evidence is available

that was not readily available when the previous decision was issued,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision involved an erroneous

interpretation of law or regulation, or material fact, or a misapplication

of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); and the decision is of

such exceptional nature as to have substantial precedential implications,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the agency's request to reconsider, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the agency's

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it

is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 01961272 (March 4, 1998) remains the Commission's

final decision. The agency shall comply with the prior decision's ORDER,

as modified below. There is no further right of administrative appeal

on the decision of the Commission on this Request to Reconsider.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial action:

1. The agency shall take corrective, curative and preventive action

to ensure that reprisal discrimination does not recur, including but

not limited to providing training to the responsible official at the

Sam Houston Finance Station, Houston, Texas, in the law of employment

discrimination. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the

training is completed, the agency shall submit to the compliance officer

appropriate documentation evidencing completion of such training.

2. The agency shall ensure that appellant is no longer supervised by

the responsible official.

3. The agency shall provide to appellant any benefits denied because of

the reprisal.

4. The agency shall conduct an investigation into what compensatory

damages appellant may be entitled to as a result of the reprisal. The

agency shall allow appellant to present evidence in support of her

compensatory damages claim.<0> Appellant shall cooperate with the agency

in this regard. Thereafter, the agency shall issue a final decision. 29

C.F.R. �1614.110. The supplemental investigation and issuance of the

final decision must be completed within sixty (60) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. A copy of the final decision must be

submitted to the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include evidence that the corrective action

has been implemented.

POSTING ORDER (G1092)

The agency is ORDERED to post at the Sam Houston Finance Station in

Houston, Texas, copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice,

after being signed by the agency's duly authorized representative,

shall be posted by the agency within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, and shall remain posted for sixty

(60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all places

where notices to employees are customarily posted. The agency shall take

reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered, defaced,

or covered by any other material. The original signed notice is to be

submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited in the paragraph

entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision," within ten (10)

calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H1092)

If appellant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint. 29

C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid by the

agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees to the

agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of

Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this decision

becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for attorney's

fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington,

D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the appellant. If

the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the appellant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408,

1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the appellant has the right to

file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the

paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.408 and 1614.409. a civil action for enforcement or a civil action

on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42

U.S.C. � 2000e-16 (Supp. V 1993). If the appellant files a civil action,

the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition

for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.410.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0993)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court

appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to

file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e

et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791,

794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion

of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 24, 1999

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An Agency of the United States Government

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission dated _________ which found that a

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any employee

or applicant for employment because of the person's RACE, COLOR, RELIGION,

SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or PHYSICAL or MENTAL DISABILITY with respect

to hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, or other terms, conditions

or privileges of employment.

The United States Postal Service, Sam Houston Finance Station, Houston,

Texas, supports and will comply with such Federal law and will not take

action against individuals because they have exercised their rights

under law.

The United States Postal Service, Sam Houston Finance Station, Houston,

Texas, has been found to have retaliated against an employee for filing an

EEO complaint and has been ordered to provide training for the responsible

official, ensure that the employee is no longer supervised by that

official, and determine whether the employee is entitled to an award

of compensatory damages. The United States Postal Service, Sam Houston

Finance Station, Houston, Texas, will ensure that officials responsible

for personnel decisions and terms and conditions of employment will

abide by the requirements of all Federal equal employment opportunity

laws and will not retaliate against employees who file EEO complaints.

The United States Postal Service, Sam Houston Finance Station, Houston,

Texas, will not in any manner restrain, interfere, coerce, or retaliate

against any individual who exercises his or her right to oppose practices

made unlawful by, or who participates in proceedings pursuant to,

Federal equal employment opportunity law.

_____________________________

Date Posted: _____________________

Posting Expires: __________________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614

01 In order to assess the claim, the agency shall request from

appellant evidence of and testimony establishing any pecuniary and

non-pecuniary injury suffered and its link to the agency's retaliatory

actions. See Feris v. Environmental Protection Agency, EEOC Appeal

No. 01934828 (August 10, 1995), request to reopen denied, EEOC Request

No. 05950936 (July 19, 1996); Carle v. Department of the Navy, EEOC

Appeal No. 01922369 (January 5, 1993); Rivera v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Appeal No. 01934157 (July 22, 1994).