Sherry J. Oshiver, Complainant,v.Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 14, 2004
01A41562_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 14, 2004)

01A41562_r

07-14-2004

Sherry J. Oshiver, Complainant, v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.


Sherry J. Oshiver v. Department of the Interior

01A41562

July 14, 2004

.

Sherry J. Oshiver,

Complainant,

v.

Gale A. Norton,

Secretary,

Department of the Interior,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A41562

Agency No. LLM-97-035

Hearing No. 100-98-7402X

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated November 7, 2003, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of sex (female), religion

(Jewish), age (45), and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

The agency failed to extend her term appointment; and

The agency denied her the opportunity to apply for term positions and

did not select her for term positions.

The record reveals that complainant's complaint was pending before an EEOC

Administrative Judge (AJ) who issued an Order of Dismissal on October 20,

2003, dismissing complainant's complaint for raising the same matters

that are the subject of a consolidated pending civil action under civil

action numbers: 00CV2284, 00-2935, 01CV1893. Thereafter, on November

9, 2003, the agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3), on the grounds that complainant filed a civil

action on the same matter.

On September 25, 2000, complainant filed a civil action (identified

as Civil Action No. 1:00CV02284) in the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia. The record further discloses that

complainant raised the issues of her termination from the agency; the

denial of the opportunity to apply for employment; and the failure of the

agency to hire her in both the civil action and the present complaint.

The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that the filing

of a civil action "shall terminate Commission processing of the appeal."

Commission regulations mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these

circumstances so as to prevent a complainant from simultaneously pursuing

both administrative and judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting

resources, and creating the potential for inconsistent or conflicting

decisions, and in order to grant due deference to the authority of

the federal district court. See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans

Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079 (May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of

Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513 (October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS,

EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October 25, 1988). Thus, upon review of the

record we find that the agency properly dismissed complainant's complaint

for raising the same matter that is the basis of a civil action.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 14, 2004

__________________

Date