01A03971
11-30-2000
Sheldon C. Hubocan, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Sheldon C. Hubocan v. United States Postal Service
01A03971
November 30, 2000
.
Sheldon C. Hubocan,
Complainant,
v.
William J. Henderson,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A03971
Agency No. 4F-907-0146-98
DECISION
On May 13, 2000, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission
from an agency decision regarding his complaint of unlawful employment
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �
621 et seq.<1> The Commission accepts the appeal in accordance with 29
C.F.R. �1614.405.
On July 13, 1999, complainant filed a formal complaint, claiming he
was discriminated against on the bases of race, religion and age.
The agency framed the claims as follows:
1) A Supervisor, Customer Services and the Growth Management Coordinator
inspected complainant's work site, asked him questions about the
processing of mail at that location, and directed complainant to use
other methods to process mail;
2) The Supervisor asked complainant, �Why don't you retire, you have
enough time?;�
3) The Supervisor took pictures of complainant's work site to aid in
the relocation of the mail room;
4) The Supervisor and Growth Management Coordinator spoke to complainant
about complaints they had received from clients on his route.
Following an investigation, complainant was provided a copy of the
investigative report and requested a hearing before an EEOC Administrative
Judge (AJ). On March 27, 2000, the AJ issued a decision dismissing
the complaint for failure to state a claim. The AJ determined that
complainant failed to show that he suffered a harm with respect to a term,
condition, or privilege of his employment. Moreover, according to the
AJ, the alleged incidents were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to
alter the conditions of complainant's employment and create a hostile
work environment.
On April 24, 2000, the agency issued a final order fully implementing
the AJ's decision.
On appeal, complainant presents no new contentions regarding the grounds
for dismissal of his complaint. Complainant instead argues that he
should receive a hearing with another AJ.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part,
that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee
or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,
.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined
an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
The only proper questions in determining whether a claim is within the
purview of the EEO process are (1) whether the complainant is an aggrieved
employee and (2) whether she has alleged employment discrimination
covered by the EEO statues. An employee is �aggrieved� if she has
suffered direct and personal deprivation at the hands of the employer.
See Hobson v. Department of the Navy, EEO Request No. 05891133 (March
2, 1990). Here, complainant argues he was discriminated against when his
work site was inspected, he was asked about the processing of mail, he was
asked about retiring, his work site was photographed and his supervisor
spoke to him about client complaints. We find that the alleged events
are sufficient to indicate that complainant may have been subjected to
discriminatory harassment that altered the conditions of his employment.
See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March
13, 1997). Since complainant has alleged that the agency's actions
were based on race, religion and age, he has raised a claim within the
purview of the EEOC regulations.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint
was improper, and is hereby REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED to the
agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the
Order below.
ORDER
The complaint is remanded to the Hearing Unit of the Los Angeles District
Office for scheduling of a hearing in an expeditious manner. The agency
is directed to submit a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Hearings
Unit within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes
final. The agency shall provide written notification to the Compliance
Officer, at the address set forth below, that the complaint file has been
transmitted to the Hearings Unit. Thereafter, the Administrative Judge
shall issue a decision on the complaint in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �
1614.109 and the agency shall issue a final action in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.110.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order
prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29
C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action
for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the
complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0900)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 30, 2000
__________________
Date
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations
governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect.
These regulations apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at
any stage in the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission
will apply the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in
deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be
found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.