01A20965_r
06-13-2002
Saeed U. Din, Complainant, v. Curt Herbert, Jr., Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Agency.
Saeed U. Din v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
01A20965
June 13, 2002
.
Saeed U. Din,
Complainant,
v.
Curt Herbert, Jr.,
Chairman,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A20965
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's November 6, 2001 decision
dismissing complainant's complaint was proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. Complainant alleges
that he was discriminated against on the bases of religion and national
origin when he was not offered a job as part of systematic and ongoing
discrimination by not providing an appropriate position consistent with
his qualifications and eligibility under Schedule A, and Federal Equal
Opportunity Recruitment Program. The agency dismissed the complaint
for failure to state a claim finding that complainant filed the complaint
with the wrong agency.
The record indicates that complainant applied for the GS-5 slot and
GS-7 slot for vacancy announcement GS-1102-5/7 Energy Industry Analyst.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued two separate certificates
of eligibles, one for each slot. Complainant did not rank high enough
to be placed on the certificate of eligibles for the GS-7 slot, and
therefore, was not selected. The agency states that no one from the
GS-5 certificate was selected for the GS-5 slot. Complainant does not
argue that anyone was selected for the GS- 5 position.
Complainant has failed to show harm from actions by the instant agency.
If complainant believes that he has been discriminated against by OPM,
complainant should contact an EEO Counselor for OPM if he has not already
done so. The Commission offers no opinion whether such a claim would
be considered as timely raised.
The agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 13, 2002
__________________
Date