Rosemarie R. Rose-Spencer, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 15, 2001
01A04631 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 15, 2001)

01A04631

03-15-2001

Rosemarie R. Rose-Spencer, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Rosemarie R. Rose-Spencer v. Department of Transportation

01A04631

March 15, 2001

.

Rosemarie R. Rose-Spencer,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A04631

Agency No. DOT-6-00-6060

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was improperly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The EEO Counselor's

Report shows that complainant sought EEO counseling on October 29, 1999,

claiming that she had been discriminated against when she was denied

employment because her former supervisor gave derogatory verbal references

about her. Complainant further claimed that after being interviewed

for different positions, she received verbal and non-verbal denials.

Subsequently, complainant filed a formal complaint claiming that she

had been discriminated against on the bases of race and reprisal when

on October 29, 1999, she was notified by a prospective employer that

her supervisor had provided derogatory information. Specifically,

complainant claimed that she was categorized as a �trouble maker;� that

she had caused a work stoppage; and that she had a negative impact on

her staff. Complainant further claimed that by making derogatory remarks

about her, his supervisor kept her from being hired for other positions.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint for failure

to state a claim after finding that complainant had been hired by the

prospective employer.

The only proper questions in determining whether a claim is within the

purview of the EEO process are (1) whether the complainant is an aggrieved

employee and (2) whether she has alleged employment discrimination covered

by the EEO statutes. An employee is "aggrieved" if she has suffered

direct and personal deprivation at the hands of the employer. See Hobson

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05891133 (March 2, 1990).

Here, complainant claims that she was the subject of derogatory references

by an agency official when seeking employment. Complainant's claim is

sufficient to render her an aggrieved employee. Because complainant has

alleged that the adverse action was based on race and reprisal, she has

raised a claim within the purview of the EEOC regulations. Accordingly,

the agency's final decision dismissing the complaint for failure to

state a claim is REVERSED. The complaint is hereby REMANDED for further

processing in accordance with the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180)

calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the agency,

or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action,

you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the

official agency head or department head, identifying that person by

his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result

in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 15, 2001

__________________

Date