Ronald L. Porter, Complainant,v.Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 16, 2003
05A30794 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 16, 2003)

05A30794

07-16-2003

Ronald L. Porter, Complainant, v. Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Ronald L. Porter v. Department of the Navy

05A30794

July 16, 2003

.

Ronald L. Porter,

Complainant,

v.

Hansford T. Johnson,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30794

Appeal No. 07A20080

Agency No. 9360530015

Hearing No. 340-97-3900X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Ronald L. Porter (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Ronald L. Porter v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal

No. 07A20080 (April 24, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b). However, we remind complainant that a �request

for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission.� Equal

Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614

(rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17. In his request for reconsideration,

complainant, through his attorney, alleges that the Commission's decision

should provide him with additional damages and corrective action, some

of which he requests for the first time.

This Commission carefully considered all of the record evidence at the

time it rendered the initial decision in question, and complainant

has offered no persuasive reason why this decision should be

reconsidered now. Therefore, after a review of complainant's request

for reconsideration, the previous decision, and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of

29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission

to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 07A20080

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration. The Commission directs the agency to take corrective

action in accordance with this decision and the Order below.<1>

ORDER

To the extent that it has not already done so, the agency is ordered to

undertake the following remedial action:

The agency shall rewrite complainant's narrative that accompanied his

less than fully successful performance rating; if that is not possible

because of the lengthy time period involved, the agency shall delete

the negative language therein that was offered as justification for

the less than fully successful rating;

2. The agency shall pursue corrective action, including but not limited

to, appropriate EEO training with the discriminating officials found

at fault herein;

The agency shall review its performance appraisal process, and shall

take whatever steps may be deemed appropriate to prevent the recurrence

of retaliatory treatment during the process, e.g., take steps to ensure

that vague evaluation criteria are not used in performance plans and

performance feedback sessions, and that performance feedback consists

of specific details on how an employee can perform his/her job to

meet expectations.

The agency shall consider taking appropriate disciplinary action

against the responsible management officials. The Commission does not

consider training to be disciplinary action. The agency shall report

its decision to the compliance officer. If the agency decides to take

disciplinary action, it shall identify the action taken. If the agency

decides not to take disciplinary action, it shall set forth the reason(s)

for its decision not to impose discipline. If any of the responsible

management officials have left the agency's employ, the agency shall

furnish documentation of their departure date(s).

POSTING ORDER (G0900)

The agency is ordered to post at its China Lake, California facility

copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after being

signed by the agency's duly authorized representative, shall be posted

by the agency within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, and shall remain posted for sixty (60) consecutive days,

in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are

customarily posted. The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure that

said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

The original signed notice is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer

at the address cited in the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the

Commission's Decision," within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration

of the posting period.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H0900)

If complainant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid

by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees

to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 16, 2003

__________________

Date

1 Complainant also alleges

that, in several ways, the agency has not complied with the order in

Ronald L. Porter v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20080

(April 24, 2003). As clearly stated in our order, if the agency fails

to comply with the Commission's order, complainant may petition the

Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a).

We additionally draw complainant's attention to the Commission's order,

which specifically describes the procedures to be followed by complainant

if he wishes to recover fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e).