Roger C. Ferreira, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 19, 2007
0120073494 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 19, 2007)

0120073494

11-19-2007

Roger C. Ferreira, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Roger C. Ferreira,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120073494

Agency No. 06-67004-02260

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final

agency decision dated July 3, 2007, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

During the period at issue, complainant was employed as a Purchasing

Agent, GS-1105-07, at the agency's Marine Corps Logistics Command (MCLC)

in Barstow, California. The record reflects that complainant's chain of

supervision was to the headquarters of the Marine Corps Logistics Command,

the MCLB Albany, Georgia.

On October 24, 2006, complainant filed the instant formal complaint.

Therein, complainant claimed that he was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of race, sex, color, age and in reprisal for prior EEO

activity.

In its July 3, 2007 final decision, the agency framed complainant's

claims as follows:

In August 2006, he was informed by management that his job position was

moving to Albany, Georgia, when he had requested to remain at his present

location (Barstow) due to family medical reasons and when management

issued him a letter dated 26 February 2007 with the decision to move

the Purchasing Agent, GS-1105-07 position, which he occupied from MCLB,

Barstow, California location to the Marine Corps Logistics Command,

Albany, Georgia.

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(5) on the grounds that the proposed notice of reassignment of

complainant's position was only a preliminary action. The agency further

found that there was no evidence to show that the agency took any action

to actually remove complainant from his Purchasing Agent position.

On appeal, complainant contends that the agency improperly framed his

claims. Specifically, complainant states "it has been my experience

along with my formal complaint that was accepted for investigation that

the agency would not correctly state the true facts as opposed to my

assertion of the facts several times, in their attempt to play down

my complaint."

In response, the agency states that on February 26, 2007, complainant

was notified by the Director of the Civilian Human Resources Office -

South East at MCLB Albany, Georgia, that a determination had been made

to transfer his Purchasing Agent position from MCLB Barstow, California

to MCLB Albany, Georgia. The agency further stated that complainant

was offered the option of transferring with his function to the new

location but complainant declined to relocate citing his health and

that of his spouse. The agency stated that rather relocating to MCLB

Albany, Georgia, complainant accepted another position with the agency

with the Regional Contracting Department of the Fleet and Industrial

Supply Center at the GS-8 level. In support of its assertions, the

agency submits a copy of complainant's SF-50 indicating the transfer

to his new position closer to his residence in San Diego, California,

effective June 10, 2007. Furthermore, the agency argues that the instant

complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim, finding that

complainant was not aggrieved.

Based on a fair reading of the record, including complainant's formal

complaint statement and an e-mail dated December 25, 2006 to the EEO

Counselor, we determine that the agency improperly framed and improperly

dismissed complainant's complaint. Here, we find that complainant stated

that when he accepted the position of Purchasing Agent, GS-1105-07, the

Team Leader promised him a grade increase from GS-7 to GS-8 which never

materialized; he experienced computer software difficulties which had

an impact upon his Purchasing Agent duties and management did nothing

to expedite fixing these difficulties; the Team Leader commented to

him after a training session that if he takes more than thirty days to

process a purchasing request, he should pick up his things and leave; and

he was set up to fail. Based on complainant's statement, as set forth

above, we find that his claims are more properly construed as a claim

of harassment. We find that this matter states a cognizable claim.

See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049

(April 21, 1994).

Moreover, the agency improperly dismissed complainant's complaint

on the grounds of alleging a proposal to take a personnel action.

As set forth above, complainant raised a harassment claim. Proposed

actions do not create a direct and personal deprivation which would

make the complainant an "aggrieved" employee within the meaning of EEO

Regulations. See Charles v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request

No. 05910190 (February 25, 1991); Lewis v. Department of the Interior,

EEOC Request No. 05900095 (February 6, 1990). However, if a proposed

action is purportedly combined with other acts of harassment to form an

alleged pattern of harassment, the agency may not properly dismiss it

as a proposed action. See Suttles v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05970496

(April 8, 1999). In the instant matter, management notifying complainant

that his Purchasing Agent position would be moved from MCLB Barstow,

California to MCLB Albany, Georgia, is part of his overall harassment

claim. Therefore, we determine that the agency's dismissal of the

instant complaint on the grounds that it is alleging a proposal to take

a personnel action is improper.

Accordingly, we REVERSE the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint, defined herein as a harassment claim, and we

REMAND this matter to the agency for further processing in accordance

with the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington,

D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 19, 2007

__________________

Date

2

0120073494

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120073494

6

0120073494