Rodger T. Williams, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 5, 2002
01a11095_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 5, 2002)

01a11095_r

07-05-2002

Rodger T. Williams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Rodger T. Williams v. United States Postal Service

01A11095

July 5, 2002

.

Rodger T. Williams,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A11095

Agency No. 1-G-754-0028-99

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated July

14, 1999, dismissing complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim

is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). In his complaint,

complainant alleged that on November 10, 1998, he received a letter

which had been forwarded to the Office of Workers' Compensation Program

(OWCP) by a management official that contained misinformation; he was

subjected to a proposed disciplinary action; false statements were

provided on his job evaluation; and he was sent an absence inquiry.

With regard to the alleged OWCP claim, the Commission has held that the

merits of the workers' compensation claim, for example, by submitting

paperwork containing allegedly false information, does not state a claim.

See Pirozzi v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970146

(October 23, 1998). With regard to the alleged proposed action,

complainant, on appeal, admits that the action was subsequently dropped

and he was never issued an actual disciplinary action. With regard to

the evaluation, complainant does not identify any specific evaluation

which contained the alleged false statements. Finally, with regard to

the alleged inquiry, complainant does not provide any evidence in the

record that he was subjected to any disciplinary action as a result

of the alleged inquiry. Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds

that complainant was not aggrieved with regard to a term, condition,

or privilege of his employment as a result of the alleged incidents.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 5, 2002

__________________

Date