Rockbestos Products Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMar 4, 194347 N.L.R.B. 1312 (N.L.R.B. 1943) Copy Citation In the Matter of ROCK11ESTOS PRODUCTS COIIPORA'IION and LOCAL B-90; INTERNATIONAL BRO'rHERIIOOD OF EI,ECtRIC.\L WORKERS, AFL Case No. R-41,902-Decided March .41, 1943 Jurisdiction : asbestos and wire products manufacturing industry Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question : rec- ognition refused without prior certification of the Bo:ud; election necessary. Unit Appropriate ,for Collective Bargaining ,: all umfoiuued guards at company's two New Haven plants, excluding the captain, sergeants, and all other su- pervisory officers. I11r. B . H. Reeves and Mr . Thomas R. Bailey, of New Haven , Conn., for the Company. I , Mr. Joseph T. Rourke, of New Haven , Conn., for the Union. Miss Illenriel J. Levor , of counsel to the Board. DECISION ANI) DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petition duly filed by Local B-90, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL, herein called the Union , alleging that a question affecting coinn)erce had arisen .concerning the reprecenta- fion,of employees of Rockbestos Products Corporation , New Haven, Connecticut , herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before ,John J. Cuneo, Trial Exaruizer . Said hearing was held at New Haven. Connecticut , on February 12, 1943. Tlie . Compaliy and the ' Union appeared, participated , and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross -examine witnesses, and- to introduce evidence- hearing on the issues . The Trial Examiner 's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case , the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. TIIE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Rockbestos Products Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, has its principal office at New Haven, Connecticut, where it operates two 47N L R.B,No 166. 1312 ROGKBESTOS PRODUCTS CORPORATI ON 1313 manufacturing plants. The Company is there engaged in the mane- facture, sale, and distribution. of insulated wire. The principal raw materials used at the New Haven plants are copper wire, and asbestos. The value of these raw materials purchased by the Company in 1942 exceeded $100,000, of which approximately 95 percent was shipped from points outside the State of Connecticut. During the same year, the Company manufactured products valued at more than $100,000, of which approximately 95 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Connecticut. The Company concedes that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Local B-90, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers,i$ a labor organization, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On or about November 1942, the Union asked the Company to recog- nize it as the bargaining representative of the Company's uniformed guards, employed at its New Haven, Connecticut, plants. The Com- pany refused recognition unless and until the Union is duly: certified as such by the Board. The statement of the Regional Director introduced in evidence at the hearing indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.' We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Union contends that the uniformed guards employed by the Company at its two New Haven plants constitute an appropriate unit for collective bargaining purposes. There has been a contract in existence between the Company and the Union which expired January 2, 1942. The bargaining unit therein, embraced all production and maintenance employees and ex- pressly excluded guards. The specific exclusion of the guards from the bargaining unit in the contract does not preclude the contracting union from representing guards as a separate unit.. As we have fre- 1 The Regional Director reported that the Union submitted 15 designations ; of which 14, all bearing apparently genuine original signatures , dated October through December 1942, correspond with names on the Company's pay roll of December 24, 1942, containing a total of 26 names in the appropriate unit. 513024-43-vol. 47-83 1314 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD quently stated- in recent cases 2 there need be no conflict between collet- - tive bargaining and duty and the guards are entitled to choose the same bargaining representative as has been chosen by other employees of the same employer. Of the Company's 27 guards, 19 are so-called "supernumeraries" of the New Haven City Police Force. These "supernumeraries" have passed'Civil Service examinations to enter the New Haven City Police Force and have been certified as eligible by the Civil. Service,Commis, Sion. They are'free to accept any employment which is not of an illegal. nature, while awaiting appointment, and if so appointed, it will be necessary for them to pass another physical examination. They wear the badges of the New Haven City Police Force but are not under its supervision. Their relationship to the Company is no different than that of the other uniformed guards except that they receive 5 cents more per hour and furnish their own uniforms. We find' that the guards' of the' Company who are also "supernumeraries" of the New Haven City • Police Force are "employees" within the meaning of the Act and should not be deprived of the right of collective bar- gaining since their presence on the waiting list of the New Haven City Police Force, does not in any, way affect their status as , employees) of the Company. The Union and the Company-are agreed that in the event the Com- pany's guards :are found to constitute an appropriate unit, all the guards at the Company's two New Haven plants, excluding the cap- tain, and',the sergeants, should be included. There are no corporals. We, find, in accordance both with our usual policy and with the afore- .aid agreement of the parties, that all uniformed guards employed by the Company at its two New Haven plants, excluding the captain, the, sergeants, and all other supervisory officers, constitute a unit ap- propriate for the purposes of , collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. E V. TIIE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the,question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec-, tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the ; Direction. 2 Matter of Chrysler Corporation, Highland Park Plant and Local 114, United Automobile, Aircraft, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, affiliated with the C. I. 0., 44 N L R. B. 881. See also Matter of Campbell .Soup Company (Camden, New Jersey, Plant) and United Cannery, Agricultural, Packing & Allied Workers, Local 80, C., I. 0., 45 N L R. B 6;- Matter of Westinghouse AtrbraAe Company and United Electawcal, Radio &'Machine Workers of America, Local No 610, 42,N..L. R. B 525. ROCKBESTOS PRODUCTS CORPORATION 1315 DIRECTION OI' ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby ,DIRECTED, that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Rockbestos Prod- ucts Corporation, New Haven, Connecticut, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible,,but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 10, of said,, Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including any such 'employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation .or temporarily laid off, and including, employees, in the armed forces of the United 'States', who preseiitEthemselves in person at, the polls, but excluding, any who have since quit or been discharged for cause; to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Local B-90, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes,of, collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation