Robert T. Prenticev.Dept. of the Air Force Petition No. 03A60008 November 8, 2005 . Robert T. Prentice, Petitioner, v. Michael L. Dominguez, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 8, 2005
03a60008 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 8, 2005)

03a60008

11-08-2005

Robert T. Prentice v. Dept. of the Air Force Petition No. 03A60008 November 8, 2005 . Robert T. Prentice, Petitioner, v. Michael L. Dominguez, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Robert T. Prentice v. Dept. of the Air Force

Petition No. 03A60008

November 8, 2005

.

Robert T. Prentice,

Petitioner,

v.

Michael L. Dominguez,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A60008

MSPB No. SF-3443-04-0748-I-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

Petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) asking for review of the Merit Systems

Protection Board's (MSPB) final decision on his case dated August 30,

2005.

Petitioner applied for the position of Accounting Technician,

GS-0525-07. Petitioner was not selected for the position and he filed

an appeal with the Department of Labor asserting that the agency failed

to properly apply his veteran's preference rights under the Veterans

Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA). When he did not prevail

on his claims, he filed the instant appeal with the MSPB. The MSPB

determined that it had jurisdiction over the appeal under 5 U.S.C. � 3330

(a), (d) and when petitioner did not request a hearing, issued a decision

on the record. In an initial decision, the MSPB Administrative Judge

found that the agency's selection of another individual did not violate

petitioner's rights under the VEOA. The decision did not give petitioner

appeal rights to the Commission. Petitioner sought review by the full

Board, which denied his request. The Board's final order did not give

appeal rights to the Commission.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

allegations of discrimination raised in connection with an action

appealable to the MSPB. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.302. Because the MSPB

did not address any matters within the Commission's jurisdiction,

the Commission has no jurisdiction to review petitioner's case. <1>

Consequently, the Commission denies the petition for review.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 8, 2005

_________________

Date

1Petitioner raised claims of age and disability discrimination in his

appeal before the Board as well as in his petition to the Commission.

These were not addressed by the MSPB because jurisdiction was accepted

under 5 U.S.C. � 3330(a), (d). To the extent that he wishes to pursue

these matters regarding his application for employment, he should contact

the agency's EEO office.