01983358_r
06-07-1999
Robert L. Segers, Appellant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.
Robert L. Segers, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01983358
) Agency No. 98-2073
Robert E. Rubin, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Treasury, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
By Notice of Appeal postmarked March 31, 1998, appellant filed an appeal
with this Commission from the February 18, 1998 final agency decision
dismissing one allegation in his EEO complaint of unlawful employment
discrimination.
Appellant acknowledges that he received the final decision on February
27, or 28, 1998. A review of the agency's final decision reveals that
the agency properly advised appellant that he had thirty (30) calendar
days after receipt of its final decision to file his appeal with the
Commission. Therefore, in order to be considered timely, appellant
had to file his appeal no later than March 30, 1998.<1> On appeal,
appellant contends that he obtained an attorney after the final decision
was received by him, and that his attorney saw the final decision for
the first on March 30, 1998. Consequently, appellant contends that
the thirty (30) day time period should run from that date. We note,
however, that 29 U.S.C. �1614.402(b) provides only for the tolling of
the time limit from the date a complainant's attorney of record receives
the final decision. In this case, as appellant conceded that he did
not obtain an attorney until after the final decision was issued, his
attorney was not an attorney of record when the final decision was issued.
Consequently, the time limitation was properly tolled from the date of
appellant's receipt. Accordingly, appellant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.402 and 1614.604.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
June 7, 1999
____________________________
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
1The thirtieth day following appellant's earliest estimated receipt
of the agency decision fell on Sunday, March 29, 1998, requiring
an extension of the time period for the filing of appellant's
appeal to the next business day, Monday, March 30, 1998.
29 C.F.R. �1614.604(d). Consequently, regardless of whether he
received the final decision on February 27 or 28, 1998, appellant
would have been required to file his appeal by March 30, 1998.