Robert J. Miller, Complainant,v.Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 1, 2008
0120073535 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 1, 2008)

0120073535

08-01-2008

Robert J. Miller, Complainant, v. Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.


Robert J. Miller,

Complainant,

v.

Carlos M. Gutierrez,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120073535

Agency No. 06-56-107

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's decision dated

July 6, 2007, finding no discrimination. In his complaint, complainant

alleged discrimination based on age (over 40) when he was terminated

from his employment during his probationary period with the agency on

September 15, 2006.

After completion of the investigation of the complaint, complainant

requested a final agency decision without a hearing. The agency

then issued its decision concluding that it asserted legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reasons for its action, which complainant failed to

rebut.

Initially, it is noted that complainant also alleged in his complaint that

his termination was also based on his disability (multiple sclerosis).

However, on appeal, complainant submits that he is not appealing the

agency's decision based on his disability. Accordingly, we do not

address the alleged discrimination based complainant's disability in

this decision.1

After a review of the record, the Commission, assuming arguendo that

complainant had established a prima facie case of age discrimination,

finds that the agency has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reasons for the alleged termination. The agency indicated that

complainant was hired as a probationary Patent Examiner, GS-1224-09, on

May 1, 2006. Management stated that complainant's termination was based

strictly on his failure to adequately perform his duties. Complainant's

supervisors stated that after four months of employment, complainant still

did not address all of the claims of his cases and submitted his work

in draft form, and not a final work product. Upon review, we find that

complainant failed to prove that the agency's reasons stated above were

pretext for the alleged discrimination. We also find that complainant

failed to provide any similarly situated individuals who were treated

better than he was treated or that the agency's decision to terminate

complainant was motivated by discrimination.

Accordingly, the agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

8/1/08

__________________

Date

1 Complainant makes no reference to the agency's dismissal of the basis

of marital status for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1). The Commission has no jurisdiction over claims of

marital status discrimination.

??

??

??

??

2

0120073535

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036