Robert Haley, Complainant,v.Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 20, 2004
01a44644 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 20, 2004)

01a44644

10-20-2004

Robert Haley, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Robert Haley v. Department of the Navy

01A44644

October 20, 2004

.

Robert Haley,

Complainant,

v.

Gordon R. England,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A44644

Agency No. DON-04-66001-08892

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed the

instant complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact.

In the instant formal complaint, complainant claimed that he was the

victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of race when,

from February 13, 2003 to January 15, 2004, he was assigned the work

of a Financial Analyst, but did not receive the higher pay commensurate

with this position.

Originally, by letter dated March 11, 2004, complainant requested that

another formal complaint, pending at the hearing stage, be amended to

include the above described claim. However, the EEOC Administrative Judge

determined that it was not 'like or related' to the pending complaint, and

so referred the captioned complaint for EEO Counseling.<1> Complainant

filed the instant complaint on April 20, 2004.

The record discloses that the last day complainant was asked to perform

the duties of a Financial Analyst was on January 15, 2004. Therefore,

using March 11, 2004, as the date of initial EEO Counselor contact, we

find complainant raised this matter beyond the forty-five (45) day limit.

On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence

warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor

contact.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 20, 2004

__________________

Date

1The pending complaint is identified as

Agency No. DON-03-66001-01; EEOC Hearing No. 340-2004-00162X, and raises

a claim concerning complainant improperly being charged with Absent

Without Authorized Leave (AWOL) and Leave Without Pay (LWOP).