Robert F. Miller, Appellant,v.Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 23, 1999
01984713 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 23, 1999)

01984713

06-23-1999

Robert F. Miller, Appellant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Robert F. Miller v. Department of Agriculture

01984713

June 23, 1999

Robert F. Miller, )

Appellant, )

) Appeal No. 01984713

v. ) Agency No. 980374

)

Daniel R. Glickman, )

Secretary, )

Department of Agriculture, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

On May 20, 1998, appellant filed a timely appeal of an April 20, 1998

final agency decision dismissing his February 19, 1998 complaint for

failure to contact an EEO Counselor in a timely manner.

Generally, an aggrieved person must initiate contact with an EEO Counselor

within 45 days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1). EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c)

provides that the time limits in Part 1614 are subject to waiver,

estoppel and equitable tolling.

Upon review, the Commission agrees with the agency that appellant's

EEO contact was untimely. The final agency decision reflects that

appellant alleged that he was unlawfully discriminated against by the

agency when on April 12, 1997, he applied for a detail to the position

of an Investigative and Enforcement Officer (IES) which was announced

in an April 10, 1997 agency memorandum. Appellant's complaint reveals

that he knew at least by June 24, 1997, that he was not selected for

the detail. The Counselor's Report reveals, and it is undisputed, that

appellant did not initiate EEO Counselor contact until November 3, 1997.

Appellant does not argue that he was unaware of the applicable time limit.

Although appellant may have been trying to resolve the matter internally,

the Commission has consistently held that utilization of internal agency

procedures, union grievances, and other remedial processes does not toll

the time limit for contacting an EEO Counselor. See Kramer v. U.S. Postal

Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01954021 (October 5, 1995). Because appellant's

November 3, 1997 contact was beyond the 45 days required, his contact

was untimely and appellant has not provided justification sufficient to

extend the time limit.

Accordingly, consistent with our discussion, the agency's final decision

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 23, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations