01A21901_r
06-05-2002
Ricky A. Muzny v. United States Postal Service
01A21901
June 5, 2002
.
Ricky A. Muzny,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A21901
Agency No. 4G-730-0011-02
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency
decision, issued on January 22, 2002, pertaining to his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et
seq. and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation
Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. The Commission accepts the
appeal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.
Complainant contacted the EEO office regarding claims of discrimination
based on sex, disability and retaliation. Informal efforts to resolve
complainant's concerns were unsuccessful. Subsequently, on November 16,
2001, complainant filed a formal complaint. The agency framed the claims
as follows:
(1) on or about August 10, 2001, management showed complainant a copy
of a pay adjustment that was processed for a grievance settlement on
May 31, 2001;
(2) on October 9, 2001, complainant carried 2.12 hours on his own
assignment but his supervisor charged the overtime on October 10,
2001; and
(3) on October 11, 2001, complainant carried 1.96 hours on his own
assignment but his supervisor charged the overtime on October 12, 2001.
On January 22, 2002, the agency issued a decision dismissing the
complaint for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the agency found
that complainant failed to provide any evidence suggesting
that he suffered a personal loss or harm with respect to a term, condition
or privilege of his employment.
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in
relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to
state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved
employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,
.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined
an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
The only proper questions in determining whether a claim is within the
purview of the EEO process are (1) whether the complainant is an aggrieved
employee and (2) whether he has alleged employment discrimination covered
by the EEO statutes. An employee is "aggrieved" if he has suffered
direct and personal deprivation at the hands of the employer. See Hobson
v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05891133 (March 2, 1990).
In claim (1), complainant contends that he entered a settlement
agreement with the agency to resolve a grievance. Complainant alleges
that "to the best of my knowledge I have not been paid the 5 hours"
as required by the settlement. On August 10, 2001, complainant states
that his supervisor said she could not find that he had been paid but
flashed a copy of a pay adjustment at him. Because claim (1) concerns the
settlement of a grievance, we find that it is an impermissible collateral
attack. The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO
complaint process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding.
See Wills v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July
30, 1998); Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No.
05940585 (September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service,
EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for
complainant to raise his concerns with the grievance settlement is
through the grievance process. Accordingly, we find that the agency
properly dismissed claim (1).
In claims (2) and (3) complainant asserts that he carried 2.12 and 1.96
hours, respectively, on his own assignment but his supervisor charged
him with overtime for the next days. While the agency concluded that
complainant failed to establish that the alleged charges resulted in a
harm or loss, we disagree. On appeal, as well as in his formal complaint,
complainant asserts that his supervisor charged the hours he carried on
his own assignment to his total hours on the overtime tracking list.
According to complainant, the list is designed to assure that the
available overtime hours are equally distributed among the carriers
seeking overtime. Complainant maintains that overtime carried on the
route one is assigned to is not to be counted on the overtime desired
list, unless a carrier is working his day off. Complainant claims that
while the supervisor inappropriately charged his hours onto the list, a
co-worker worked his day off and his hours were not charged on the list.
Because claims (2) and (3) concern complainant's eligibility for overtime
assignments, we find that complainant is an "aggrieved" employee with
regard to these allegations. Since he has alleged that the adverse
action was based on reprisal, he has raised a claim within the purview
of the EEO regulations. Therefore, we find that the agency's decision
to dismiss claims (2) and (3) for failure to state a claim was improper.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss claim (1) was proper and
is hereby AFFIRMED. The agency's decision to dismiss claims (2) and
(3) was improper and hereby REVERSED. Claims (2) and (3) are REMANDED
to the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision
and the Order below.
ORDER (E0900)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement
of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the
right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).
Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on
the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled
"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.
A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying
complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)
(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it
also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in
an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar
days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion
of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion
of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative
processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after
one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your
complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until
such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.
If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the
complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,
identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 5, 2002
__________________
Date