Rick C. Bard, Complainant,v.R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 16, 2005
05a50927 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 16, 2005)

05a50927

11-16-2005

Rick C. Bard, Complainant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Rick C. Bard v. Department of Veterans Affairs

05A50927

November 16, 2005

.

Rick C. Bard,

Complainant,

v.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Request No. 05A50927

Appeal No. 01A50015

Agency Nos. 200I-0573-2003100261; 200I-0573-2003101400

Hearing Nos. 150-2004-00131X; 150-2004-00132X

DENIAL

Rick C. Bard (complainant) timely requested reconsideration of the

decision in Rick C. Bard v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A50015 (May 6, 2005). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission

may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous

Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the

appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material

fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In his formal complaint, complainant alleged that the agency discriminated

against him, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., on the bases of his

race (Native American), sex, and in reprisal for prior protected EEO

activity when he was subjected to a hostile work environment. Following

an investigation, an EEOC Administrative Judge issued a decision without

a hearing finding no discrimination. The AJ concluded that viewing the

evidence in a light most favorable to complainant, he failed to establish,

by a preponderance of the evidence, that any of the agency's actions were

motivated by discriminatory or retaliatory animus toward his protected

classes. The agency's final order implemented the AJ's finding of no

discrimination, and on appeal the Commission affirmed the final order.

In his request, complainant makes numerous contentions regarding the

credibility of statements made by his supervisor, and alleges that

the agency has a "hidden agenda" to remove him from his position and

protect upper management. Complainant does not, however, put forth any

arguments or evidence to show that the agency's actions in the instant

complainant were taken because of his race, sex, or prior EEO activity.

Accordingly, after reconsidering the previous decision and the entire

record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria

of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A50015 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 16, 2005

__________________

Date