Rene M. Marmol, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 20, 2011
0120112971 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 20, 2011)

0120112971

10-20-2011

Rene M. Marmol, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Pacific Area), Agency.




Rene M. Marmol,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112971

Agency No. 1F941003211

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated April 20, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Upon review, the

Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Custodian at the Agency’s Processing and Distribution Center

facility in San Francisco, California.

On April 5, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the

Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (Hispanic),

national origin (El Salvador), disability (pulmonary/respiratory

condition), and age (58) when, since December 22, 2010, he has been

subjected to a pattern and practice of discrimination when he was

repeatedly exposed to serious injury, causing his health problems to

be aggravated.

The record indicates that Complainant alleged he was forced to work

with certain chemicals that violated his medical restrictions. The

record contains a letter from the reasonable accommodation committee

indicating Complainant’s pulmonary/respiratory condition prohibited

him from working around chemicals.

In its final decision, the Agency dismissed the matter for failure to

state a claim finding Complainant was not aggrieved and that the incidents

were insufficient to support a claim of harassment. The instant appeal

followed.

In his appeal, Complainant states he has a history of respiratory

problems. Complainant stated in 2006 he brought in medical documentation

and was provided reasonable accommodation. However, in December 2010,

Agency officials assigned him to work with chemicals that aggravated

his condition.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee

or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). When the complainant does not

allege he or she is aggrieved within the meaning of the regulations,

the agency shall dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

In the instant case, Complainant is clearly stating a claim that the

Agency is failing to reasonably accommodate his condition and forcing

him to work outside of his medical restrictions. Further, Complainant

stated that he was accommodated in the past, but since December 2010 has

been required to work with chemicals. As such, Complainant has alleged

an injury or harm to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is REVERSED. The complaint is hereby REMANDED to the Agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the

Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall

issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant’s

request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 20, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120112971

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120112971