Rena F. Williams, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 16, 2001
01A14129_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 16, 2001)

01A14129_r

10-16-2001

Rena F. Williams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Rena F. Williams v. United States Postal Service

01A14129

October 16, 2001

.

Rena F. Williams,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14129

Agency No. 1-D-404-0015-00

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's May 11, 2001

decision dismissing complainant's complaint was proper pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the untimely filing of the formal

complaint. Complainant alleges that she was discriminated against on

the bases of race, sex, age, and retaliation, when: (1) from April 20,

2000 through present, she was denied a lateral move to the position of

Supervisor Customer Service when vacancies existed and lesser qualified

people were given the job position; (2) on an unspecified date she

was admonished/berated over the loud speaker; and (3) on September 14,

15, and 18-22, 2000, her settlement agreement dated July 27, 2000 was

breached by the Postmaster in Lexington, KY.

Complainant received the notice of right to file a formal complaint

on January 24, 2001. Although the notice indicated that complainant

had to file a formal complaint within 15 calendar days of its receipt,

complainant did not file her formal complaint until March 24, 2001,

which is beyond the limitation period. Therefore, we find that claims

1 and 2 were properly dismissed on the grounds that complainant failed

to timely file her complaint.

The Commission notes that claim 3 alleges breach of a settlement

agreement. The agency should have made a determination as to whether or

not it breached the settlement agreement. In the absence of a decision,

the Commission will review the claim of breach pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.504(b). On July 27, 2000, the parties entered into a settlement

agreement, which provided, in pertinent part, that complainant would

receive the following:

Rena Williams will be detailed for no less than four (4) months to a

Lexington, KY Supervisor, Customer Service position.

2. Lexington Postmaster [A], will determine which Lexington Station

Ms. Williams will be assigned.

The detail will be effective no later than August 19, 2000.

[Complainant's] Prime/Programmed/Choice Annual Leave will be honored.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504 provides that if the complainant

believes that the agency failed to comply with the terms of a settlement

agreement, the complainant should notify the Director of Equal Employment

Opportunity, in writing, of the alleged noncompliance with the settlement

agreement, within thirty (30) days of when the complainant knew or should

have known of the alleged noncompliance. The complainant may request that

the terms of the settlement agreement be specifically implemented or,

alternatively, that the complaint be reinstated for further processing

from the point processing ceased. The agency shall resolve the matter and

respond to the complainant, in writing. If the agency has not responded

to the complainant, in writing, or if the complainant is not satisfied

with the agency's attempt to resolve the matter, the complainant may

appeal to the Commission for a determination as to whether the agency

has complied with the terms of the settlement agreement or final decision.

The Commission has held that settlement agreements are contracts between

the complainant and the agency and it is the intent of the parties

as expressed in the contract, and not some unexpressed intention, that

controls the contract's construction. Eggleston v. Department of Veterans

Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05900795 (August 23, 1990). In addition, the

Commission generally follows the rule that if a writing appears to be

plain and unambiguous on its face, its meaning must be determined from

the four corners of the instrument without resort to extrinsic evidence

of any nature. See Montgomery Elevator v. Building Engineering Services,

730 F.2d 377 (5th Cir. 1984). The Commission has followed this rule

when interpreting settlement agreements. The Commission's policy in

this regard is based on the premise that the face of the agreement best

reflects the understanding of the parties.

By letter dated October 7, 2000, complainant appears to allege that the

agency breached the settlement agreement by not detailing her for the

full 4 months as agreed upon in provision 1 of the settlement agreement.

The agency has not addressed, and the record does not show, whether

the agency has complied with provision 1 of the agreement. Therefore,

the agency shall issue a decision as to whether or not it is in breach

of the settlement agreement.

The agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint of

discrimination (claims 1 and 2) is AFFIRMED. The agency's determination

regarding complainant's claim that the agency breached the settlement

agreement is VACATED and the breach of settlement claim is REMANDED to

the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and

applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency, within thirty calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, shall issue a decision pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504

determining whether it is in breach of provision 1 of the settlement

agreement dated July 27, 2000. The agency shall supplement the record

with evidence supporting its decision. A copy of the agency decision

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 16, 2001

__________________

Date