Regineald Grimes, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 3, 2002
01A23828_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 3, 2002)

01A23828_r

10-03-2002

Regineald Grimes, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Regineald Grimes v. United States Postal Service

01A23828

October 3, 2002

.

Regineald Grimes,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23828

Agency No. 1J-631-0046-02

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 15, 2002, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

and disability when:

In October 1999, complainant was denied the opportunity to appeal his

complaint (agency case number 4-I-630-0116-99) after the REDRESS program

failed to resolve complainant's claims.

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(8)

as alleging dissatisfaction with the processing of a previously filed

complaint. The agency found that complainant failed to pursue his prior

complaint (4-I-630-0116-99) after REDRESS failed in October 1999, until

he again contacted the agency December 10, 2001. The agency found that

certified mail sent to complainant in October 1999 and November 1999

was returned unclaimed and thereafter, complainant could not be located.

Moreover, the agency found the claims raised in complainant's March 20,

2002 complaint (agency number 1-J-631-0046-02) are the same as those

raised in complainant's prior EEO matter (agency number 4-I-630-0116-99).

The Commission finds that complainant's claims regarding the processing of

a previous EEO matter are properly dismissed pursuant to � 1614.107(a)(8).

To the extent that complainant is attempting to resurrect his claim

regarding his termination that he raised in agency number 4-I-630-0116-99,

we find that complainant's contact of an EEO Counselor on December 10,

2001, was beyond the 45 day deadline set forth in � 1614.105(a)(1)

and is properly dismissed pursuant to � 1614.107(a)(2) for untimely EEO

Counselor contact.

The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 3, 2002

__________________

Date