[Redacted], Woodrow F.., 1 Complainant,v.Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Mar 13, 2023

Appeal No. 2022002380 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 13, 2023)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Woodrow F..,1 Complainant, v. Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency. Request No. 2023000427 Appeal No. 2022002380 Agency No. DON-21-68094-00794 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2022002380 (September 27, 2022). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2 2023000427 During the relevant time, Complainant worked for the Agency as a Materials Expediter in Camp Pendleton, California. On July 18, 2021, Complainant filed a formal complaint claiming unlawful retaliation for prior protected activity when he was issued a letter of reprimand; he was issued a notice of proposed suspension; and he received notification of a decision on a proposed 14-day suspension. Complainant also claimed that he was subjected to a hostile work environment when he was accused of reporting to work not ready, willing, and able to work; and he was told to take annual leave and was sent home for insubordination and refusing to work. Following an investigation into the complaint, Complainant did not request a hearing within the time frame provided in 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108(f). The Agency issued a final decision, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110(b), based on the evidence developed during the investigation, and conclude unlawful retaliation was not established. Complainant appealed. In EEOC Appeal No. 2022002380, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s final decision finding no retaliation was proven. We have reviewed the instant request for reconsideration and determine that Complainant raises no arguments that would affect the disposition of his case in the prior decision. A request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9 § VI.A (Aug. 5, 2015); see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2022002380 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. 3 2023000427 RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations March 13, 2023 Date