[Redacted], Roxane C., 1 Complainant,v.Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Mar 7, 2023

Appeal No. 2022001529 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 7, 2023)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Roxane C.,1 Complainant, v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency. Request No. 2023000701 Appeal No. 2022001529 Agency No. HS-CBP-00194-2020 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in Roxane C. v. Dep’t of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 2022001529 (Nov. 3, 2022). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). The record indicates that Complainant filed her complaint alleging discrimination based on race, national origin, sex, religion, color, disability, age, genetic information, parental status, and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when: 1. From January 31, 2003, through September 15, 2004, she was subjected to harassment, culminating in her removal from her position as a Management Program Specialist; and 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2023000701 2 2. On or about October 28, 2019, she was dissatisfied with the information relayed by the EEO Counselor. The Agency dismissed the complaint on numerous grounds, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.107(a)(1), .107(a)(4), and .107(a)(8). Complainant filed an appeal and the Commission, in EEOC Appeal No. 202004009 (Oct. 6, 2020), request for reconsideration denied, EEOC Request No. 2021000324 (Jan. 5, 2021), affirmed the Agency’s dismissal. Complainant subsequently filed a hearing request with an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). The AJ dismissed the matter for lack of jurisdiction, noting that the matter was previously adjudicated by the Commission and/or raised in at least one civil action filed in U.S. District Court. Complainant appealed, and the Commission’s prior decision dismissed the appeal. In her request, Complainant provides no evidence to warrant granting her request. The Commission emphasizes that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (Aug. 5, 2015), at 9-18; see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2022001529 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. 2023000701 3 You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations March 7, 2023 Date