Ray A. Garza, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 23, 2000
01a02922 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 23, 2000)

01a02922

06-23-2000

Ray A. Garza, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ray A. Garza v. United States Postal Service

01A02922

June 23, 2000

Ray A. Garza, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A02922

) Agency No. 4G-780-0070-99

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

On March 6, 2000, Ray A. Garza (hereinafter referred to as complainant)

filed a timely appeal from the February 3, 2000, final decision of the

United States Postal Service (hereinafter referred to as the agency)

concerning his termination on May 8, 1992. The appeal is timely filed

(see 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402(a)))<1> and is accepted in

accordance with 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (to be codified as 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405). For the reasons that follow, the agency's decision is AFFIRMED.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the agency properly

dismissed his complaint for untimely contact with an EEO counselor.

On March 27, 1998, complainant contacted an EEO counselor with regard to

his termination in May 1992. He stated that he had just learned that

the supervisor who had caused his removal had been relocated allegedly

because of problems with ethnic minorities. He further explained that,

at the time of the removal action, the union had "misled" him, causing him

to ignore his rights of appeal, in that, he relied on the union's efforts

in support of his request for disability retirement, which was denied.

The Commission's regulations require that a complainant bring his/her

complaint to the attention of an EEO counselor within 45 days of

an alleged discriminatory event or the effective date of an alleged

discriminatory personnel action. 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(2). The record

shows that complainant contacted an EEO counselor approximately six years

from the event and failed to offer sufficient justification for the delay.

Complainant's contact with an EEO counselor was untimely, and the agency

properly dismissed the complaint. 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(2)).<2>

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the agency's decision was proper and is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

06-23-00

Date Carlton Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________ ______________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the

revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable,

in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also

be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2To the extent that complainant complains about union representation, he

fails to state a claim under EEOC regulations. 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,

37,656 (to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1)).