Ramiro A. Rodriguez, Appellant,v.F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 24, 1999
05970875 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 24, 1999)

05970875

06-24-1999

Ramiro A. Rodriguez, Appellant, v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Agency.


Ramiro A. Rodriguez v. Department of the Air Force

05970875

June 24, 1999

Ramiro A. Rodriguez, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05970875

) Appeal No. 01960597

F. Whitten Peters, ) Agency No. T0603TXF0993NO

Acting Secretary, )

Department of the Air Force, )

National Guard Bureau, )

Agency. )

___________________________________)

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On June 25, 1997, the agency timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to reconsider the decision in Ramiro

A. Rodriguez v. Sheila Widnall, Secretary, Department of the Air Force,

National Guard Bureau, EEOC Appeal No. 01960597 (June 2, 1997). EEOC

Regulations provide that the Commissioners may, in their discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The

party requesting reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence

which tends to establish one or more of the following three criteria:

new and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1);

the previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); and the previous decision is of such

exceptional nature as to have substantial precedential implications,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration,

appellant's response, the previous decision, and the entire record, the

Commission finds the agency's request does not meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the

agency's request. The decision of the Commission in Appeal No. 01960597,

remanding appellant's nonselection allegation for processing, remains

the Commission's final decision in this matter. The agency shall carry

out the order set forth in our previous decision, as reproduced below.

There is no further right of administrative appeal from a decision of

the Commission on a request for reconsideration.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegation concerning

his nonselection for the position of Logistics Management Officer in

accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge

to the appellant that it has received the remanded allegations within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that it receives this decision.

The agency shall issue to appellant a copy of the investigative file and

also shall notify appellant of the appropriate rights within one hundred

fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless

the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the appellant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a

final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 24, 1999

_______________ ______________________________

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat