Rafael J. Heredia, Complainant,v.Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 5, 2003
01A22353_r (E.E.O.C. Jun. 5, 2003)

01A22353_r

06-05-2003

Rafael J. Heredia, Complainant, v. Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Agency.


Rafael J. Heredia v. Smithsonian Institution

01A22353

June 5, 2003

.

Rafael J. Heredia,

Complainant,

v.

Lawrence M. Small,

Secretary,

Smithsonian Institution,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22353

Agency No. 99-02-100898

Hearing No. 100-99-7177P

DECISION

The record indicates that complainant, as class agent, filed a class

complaint, dated October 8, 1998, alleging discrimination on the bases

of race and national origin when he and putative class members were

treated unfairly in the areas of: (1) hiring practices; (2) promotions;

(3) discipline; (4) agency due process; and (5) societal exclusion of

Latinos. On October 23, 2001, an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) dismissed

complainant's individual complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3),

for filing a civil action on the same matter. The AJ dismissed the class

complaint finding that complainant's class complaint does not meet the

prerequisites for certifying the class. The AJ found that complainant,

after filing a civil action in federal district court, no longer meets

the requirements of a class agent. The agency, on February 11, 2002,

issued a decision fully implementing the AJ's decision.

The regulations set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3), allows for the

dismissal of a complaint that is pending in a United States District

Court in which the complainant is a party. The record reflects that,

by complaint form dated June 26, 1999, complainant filed a complaint in

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, identified as

98Civ.5351(DAB)(RLE). We find that complainant's claims raised in the

civil action are the same as those claims raised in the class complaint.

Therefore, complainant's individual complaint is properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3), for raising the same claim in

a civil action.

Under EEOC Regulations, a class complaint must allege: (i) the class

is so numerous that a consolidated complaint concerning the individual

claims of its member is impractical; (ii) there are questions of fact

common to the class; (iii) the class agency's claims are typical of the

claims of the class; and (iv) the agent of the class, or if represented,

the representative, will fairly and adequately protect the interests of

the class. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204(a)(2). The agency may reject a class

complaint if any of these certification prerequisites are not met.

In this case, we find that since the class agent filed a civil action

on the same matters, the current class agent may no longer serve as

class agent. Without a class agent, the class can not be certified.

The Commission recognizes that there may be other putative members of

the class who may be willing to serve as the class agent. The Commission

notes that there is no evidence in the record to suggest that complainant

was instructed to find another class agent, with knowledge that failure

to do so would result in dismissal. Under the instant circumstances,

the Commission finds that the instant class agent should be given

the opportunity to substitute a new class agent. If no new class

agent volunteers to serve as class agent, then the agency may properly

re-dismiss the class complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204. If a

new class agent does volunteer to serve as class agent, then the agency

shall return the matter to the AJ for a new determination regarding

class certification and processing, as appropriate.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing the individual complaint is

AFFIRMED. The agency's decision dismissing the class complaint is hereby

VACATED, and the class complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further

processing in accordance with this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency, within 15 calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, shall provide complainant (the existing class agent) with the

opportunity to designate a new class agent who could meet the requirements

for class certification pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204. If, within

30 calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, no new class

agent is designated, then the agency shall, within 60 calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, re-dismiss the class complaint pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204. If a new class agent is designated within 30

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, then the agency

shall, within 40 calendar days of the date this decision becomes final,

forward the case to the appropriate EEOC District Office for assignment

of an Administrative Judge for further processing in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.204(d).

A copy of the agency's letter providing complainant with the opportunity

to designate a new class agent and either a copy of the agency's new

decision or a copy of the notice forwarding the class complaint to the

appropriate EEOC District Office, must be sent to the Compliance Officer

as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 5, 2003

__________________

Date