Prashant Katyal, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 12, 2008
0120083084 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 12, 2008)

0120083084

09-12-2008

Prashant Katyal, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Prashant Katyal,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083084

Agency No. 1F957003608

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated May 30, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

At the time of the events at issue, complainant was employed by the agency

as a Clerk at the Sacramento, California Processing and Distribution

Center. Complainant had filed a previous EEO complaint against

the agency, identified as Agency Case No. 1F-957-0047-05, which was

settled between the parties on September 10, 2007, by written agreement.

Therein, complainant agreed, among other things, to certain procedures

for reporting absences, including providing certain medical documentation

in specified circumstances. Complainant received $25,000 as part of

the settlement agreement. The agreement also informed complainant that

should a dispute arise regarding the implementation of the agreement,

he would contact the Manager of the EEO Compliance and Appeals.

On May 21, 2008, complainant filed another EEO complaint, the one at issue

in the instant appeal. In its final decision, the agency characterized

this complaint as follows: complainant alleged that he was subjected

to discrimination on the bases of race (Indian), sex (male), religion

(not specified), color (not specified), disability (shoulder/back), and

reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when, on or about April 10,

2008, he was issued a notice to provide documentation related to the

settlement agreement in Agency Case. No. 1F-957-0047-05. The agency

dismissed this complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(8) as a

claim alleging dissatisfaction with the processing of a prior complaint.

The agency reasoned that complainant was now dissatisfied with being

required to comply with the terms of September 2007 agreement that

settled his prior complaint. On appeal, the agency further argued that

to the extent that complainant was asserting some sort of breach of the

agreement by the agency, the appropriate avenue to raise this concern

is through the mechanism specifically provided for in the agreement,

as well as the procedures outlined in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504.

After careful review of the record, we determine that the agency

has improperly characterized the nature of complainant's current

EEO complaint. An examination of the complaint in conjunction with

the related pre-complaint materials reveals that rather than a claim of

dissatisfaction with the terms of the September 2007 settlement agreement,

complainant is now claiming discrimination and retaliation when his

medical insurance was wrongfully terminated by the agency and not

reinstated, he was ordered to provide additional medical documentation

which he could not get because he had no medical insurance, he was placed

in AWOL status beginning on March 22, 2008, and he was threatened with

additional disciplinary action. Further, complainant seems to allege

that even after providing the requested medical information to the agency,

it refused to bring him back to work.

The Commission finds that the complaint stated a claim under the EEOC

regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). The Commission notes that

the agency cannot use the September 2007 settlement agreement as a means

to bar complainant from raising prospective issues. Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is reversed.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims, as redefined

by this decision, in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq.

The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant that it has received

the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this

decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to complainant a copy

of the investigative file and also shall notify complainant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved

prior to that time. If the complainant requests a final decision without

a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60)

days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 12, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083084

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120083084