Paul R. Cox, Complainant,v.Mark V. Rosenker, Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 5, 2007
0120072654 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 5, 2007)

0120072654

09-05-2007

Paul R. Cox, Complainant, v. Mark V. Rosenker, Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, Agency.


Paul R. Cox,

Complainant,

v.

Mark V. Rosenker,

Chairman,

National Transportation Safety Board,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072654

Hearing No. 570-2006-00505X

Agency No. NTSB-2005-19

DECISION

On May 23, 2007, complainant filed an appeal from the agency's April

23, 2007, final order concerning his equal employment opportunity (EEO)

complaint alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. �

2000e et seq. The appeal is deemed timely and is accepted for the

Commission's de novo review pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a).

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, complainant was as a

Senior Air Safety Investigator, GS-14, at the agency's Office of Aviation

Safety, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office facility in Ashburn, Virginia.

On November 24, 2005, complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that he

was discriminated against on the basis of reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity arising under Title VII when on August 10, 2005, he was

notified that he had not been selected for the position of Supervisory

Air Safety Investigator (Regional Director), GS-15, in the Office of

Aviation Safety, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office in Ashburn, Virginia.

At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant was provided with a

copy of the report of investigation and notice of his right to request

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). Complainant timely

requested a hearing. The AJ assigned to the case determined sua sponte

that the complaint did not warrant a hearing, and requested briefing

from the parties. The agency submitted a motion for a decision without

a hearing on September 11, 2006 and complainant submitted his objections

on September 18, 2006. The agency further responded to complainant's

objection on September 20, 2006. The AJ issued a decision without a

hearing on March 14, 2007. The agency subsequently issued a final order

adopting the AJ's finding that complainant failed to prove that he was

subjected to discrimination as alleged.

After a thorough review of the record, and the arguments submitted by

the parties on appeal, we find that the AJ's decision without a hearing

was appropriate, as no genuine issue of material fact is in dispute.

See Petty v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A24206 (July 11,

2003); Murphy v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01A04099 (July

11, 2003). We further find that the AJ's conclusion that complainant has

not shown that he was discriminated against based on his prior protected

EEO activity, and the agency's implementation of that decision, was

correct, and we AFFIRM the agency's finding of no discrimination.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

9-5-07

__________________

Date

2

0120072654

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120072654