Patricia M. Bavaro, Complainant,v.Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 13, 2002
01A23019_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 13, 2002)

01A23019_r

08-13-2002

Patricia M. Bavaro, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Patricia M. Bavaro v. Department of the Treasury

01A23019

August 13, 2002

.

Patricia M. Bavaro,

Complainant,

v.

Paul H. O'Neill,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23019

Agency No. 02-3132

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an

agency decision pertaining to her complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act

of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

The Commission accepts the appeal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

Complainant contacted the EEO office regarding claiming she was

discriminated against when she was terminated during her probationary

period. Informal efforts to resolve complainant's concerns were

unsuccessful. Subsequently, on March 22, 2002, complainant filed a

formal complaint based on disability.

On April 11, 2002, the agency issued a decision dismissing the complaint

on the grounds that it was untimely filed. The agency reasoned that

although complainant stated that she thought she had 90 days to file

the complaint, she was informed about the fifteen-day time limitation.

Based on a review of the record, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2),

due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint. The record

indicates that a Notice of Right to File a Discrimination Complaint

(hereinafter "Notice") was received by complainant on February 19, 2002.

Although the notice indicated that complainant had to file a formal

complaint within fifteen calendar days of its receipt, complainant

did not file her complaint until March 22, 2002, which is beyond the

limitation period. When asked by the agency for a reason for the

delay, complainant explained that "due to the stressful time I have

been under since the loss of my job, I was under the impression I had

90 days to file." The record establishes, however, that complainant was

notified of the fifteen day time limit. Further, on appeal, complainant

contends that she has suffered from depression. We have consistently

held, in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that

an extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated

by his condition that he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits.

See Davis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05980475

(August 6, 1998); Crear v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05920700 (October 29, 1992). Complainant has not shown that she

was so incapacitated by her mental health problems.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint was proper

and is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 13, 2002

__________________

Date