01982058
02-26-1999
Patricia L. Chilton, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.
Patricia L. Chilton v. Social Security Administration
01982058
February 26, 1999
Patricia L. Chilton, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01982058
) Agency No. 98-0165-SSA
Kenneth S. Apfel, )
Commissioner, )
Social Security Administration, )
Agency. )
___________________________________)
DECISION
The agency issued a decision dated December 23, 1997 dismissing
appellant's complaint on the grounds that appellant failed to timely
file the complaint. In the December 23, 1997 decision the agency also
dismissed allegation 2 for failing to state a claim. On February 25,
1998 the agency issued a second decision dismissing the complaint.
The February 25, 1998 decision defined the allegations the same as the
agency defined the allegations in the December 23, 1997 decision:
Appellant alleges that based on her age and in reprisal for having
testified in a previous complaint, appellant has been subjected to
a hostile work environment in the form of the following incidents of
harassment:
On May 2, 1997, appellant became aware that the Hearing Office Manager
(HOM) encouraged her coworkers to look for errors in her work product.
The HOM would like appellant to work in a different position so he can
fill appellant's Docket Clerk position with someone younger.
In the February 25, 1998 decision the agency dismissed the complaint
for failing to state a claim. The agency found in the February 25,
1998 decision that appellant's complaint failed to state a claim of
harassment.
The Commission finds that the agency's February 25, 1998 decision
effectively rescinded the agency's December 23, 1997 decision. Appellant's
appeal addresses the agency's February 25, 1998 decision to dismiss the
complaint for failing to state a claim. Therefore, we consider this
appeal to be an appeal from the agency's February 25, 1998 decision.
The Commission finds that the complaint was properly dismissed for failing
to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a). The Commission
finds that all of the incidents cited in the entire complaint are
not sufficient, when examined in their entirety, to state a claim
of harassment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request
No. 05970077 (Mar. 13, 1997).
The agency's February 25, 1998 decision dismissing the complaint is
AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,
YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE
OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS
OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a
civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the
Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in
which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
Feb 26, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations