Patricia D. Teal, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 8, 2000
01A05578 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 8, 2000)

01A05578

11-08-2000

Patricia D. Teal, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Patricia D. Teal v. United States Postal Service

01A05578

November 8, 2000

.

Patricia D. Teal,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A05578

Agency No. 4D-280-0174-00

DECISION

On August 18, 2000, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission

from an agency decision pertaining to her complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Age Discrimination

in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.;

and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.<1> The Commission accepts the appeal

in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.405.

Complainant contacted the EEO office regarding claims of discrimination

based on race, sex, age, disability, and retaliation. Informal efforts

to resolve complainant's concerns were unsuccessful. Subsequently,

on May 29, 2000, complainant filed a formal complaint claiming she was

discriminated against when:

On April 10, 2000, she submitted a letter to the Mid-Carolinas District

EEO office expressing her dissatisfaction with the handling of her prior

EEO complaints.

The agency issued a decision, on July 10, 2000, dismissing the complaint

on the grounds that it alleged dissatisfaction with the processing of

a previously filed complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(8).

Specifically, the agency cited fourteen of complainant's prior cases.

According to the agency, in each case either a decision was issued;

a settlement agreement was reached; or a Notice of Right to File was

issued without complainant filing a complaint. The agency concluded

that complainant should have expressed her dissatisfaction during the

processing of those cases, rather than by filing the instant compliant.

Complainant makes no contentions on appeal.

Claims alleging dissatisfaction with the processing of a prior

complaint must be dismissed. See EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 107 (a)(8).

Dissatisfaction with the EEO process must be raised within the underlying

complaint, not a new complaint. See EEOC - Management Directive 110

(as revised Nov. 9, 1999) 5-23, 5-25 to 5-26.

A review of the record reveals that complainant requested counseling

regarding her �dissatisfaction of the handling of [her] EEO complaints.�

In her formal complaint, complainant simply listed the case numbers for

her prior complaints in the space provided for the alleged discriminatory

event. Similarly, in the portion of the form for the requested remedy,

complainant wrote �Previously stated on each complaint form.� Therefore,

the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed the complaint

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(8), as it concerns the processing of

her prior complaints.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint was proper

and is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 8, 2000

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.