Paperworkers Local 832Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 21, 1981258 N.L.R.B. 67 (N.L.R.B. 1981) Copy Citation PAPERWORKERS LO.()CAL. 832 United Paperworkers International Union, AFL- CIO, Local 832 and Duro Paper Bag Manufac- turing Co. Case 9-CC-895 September 21, 1981 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ORDER BY MEMBERS FANNING, JENKINS, AND ZIMMERMAN On July 14, 1978, the National Labor Relations Board issued a Decision and Order in the above- entitled proceeding,' finding, on the stipulated fac- tual record, that the picketing activity engaged in by Respondent did not violate Section 8(b)(4)(ii) (B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amend- ed. The Board accordingly dismissed the complaint in its entirety. Thereafter, the Charging Party and the picketed Employer, The Kroger Co., filed petitions to review the Board's Decision and Order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Cir- cuit. On October 27, 1980, the court issued its opin- ion in which it set aside the Board's dismissal of the complaint and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. 2 On Febru- ary 11, 1981, the Board advised the parties that it had decided to accept the remand of the court. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its au- thority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. In considering the matter before us, we accept as the law of this case the court's findings and conclu- sions. We find that on four occasions in May 1977 Respondent picketed two retail grocery stores in Kentucky operated by The Kroger Co., with whom Respondent had no labor dispute. Kroger, however, purchased the paper bags it used to sack customer's groceries from the Charging Party with whom Respondent was then engaged in a lawful economic strike. Respondent's pickets at the Kroger stores asked Kroger's customers not to use bags made by the Charging Party but to bring their own bags when shopping at Kroger. In the Board's original decision in this proceed- ing, the Board found that "the consumer picketing of [Kroger], with picket signs adequately identify- ing the struck product, and under circumstances in which the product was not integrated into Kroger's overall operation to such a degree that it could not remain identifiable, was lawful picket- ' 236 NLRB 1525. 2 See 647 F.2d 643. On November 12, 1980. Respondent filed a petition for rehearing. On December 19, 1980, the circuit court denied Recpond- ent's petition. 258 NLRB No. 13 ing" and did not violate Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) of the Act.: On review, however, the court found that "the paper bags were necessary for Kroger to sell its groceries. The bags were part and parcel of every purchase made at the store. No meaningful alterna- tive to their use was demonstrated .... Because they were necessary, they lost their separate identi- ty and merged into the operation of the store; a successful boycott of the Duro bags would have required a boycott of Kroger as well." 4 This, the court found, was "precisely the problem that Con- gress sought to avoid through [Section] 8(b)(4)(ii)(B)." ' Finding no substantial evidence to support the Board's findings and its dismissal of the complaint, the court set aside that dismissal and, as noted, remanded this proceeding to the Board for further proceedings "consistent with [its] opin- ion." 6 It is clear from its opinion that the court has concluded that Respondent's picketing here violat- ed the Act. In accord with the court's opinion, then, we find that Respondent violated Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) of the Act by its picketing of Kroger's stores and we shall order it to cease and desist therefrom and take further appropriate action including the posting of notices. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Duro Paper Bag Manufacturing Co., and The Kroger Co., are employers and persons engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 2. Respondent is a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. 3. By threatening, coercing, and restraining The Kroger Co., with an object of forcing it to cease doing business with Duro Paper Manufacturing Co., Respondent has engaged in unfair labor prac- tices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) of the Act. ORDER Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Re- lations Board hereby orders that the Respondent, United Paperworkers International Union, AFL- CIO, Local 832, Ludlow, Kentucky, its officers, agents, and representatives, shall: 1. Cease and desist from threatening, coercing, or restraining The Kroger Co., or any other person engaged in commerce, where an object thereof is :' See 235 NLRB at 1527-28 (1978) 4 647 F.2d at 637 647 F.2d at 638. 647 F.2d at 639 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD to force or require such person to cease doing busi- ness with Duro Paper Bag Manufacturing Co. 2. Take the following affirmative action which is necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act: (a) Post at Respondent's business office, hiring halls, and meeting halls, copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix." 7 Copies of said notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 9, after being duly signed by Respondent's authorized representative, shall be posted by Re- spondent immediately upon receipt thereof, and be maintained by it for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to members are customarily posted. Rea- sonable steps shall be taken by Respondent to insure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. 7 In the event that this Order is enforced by a Judgment of a United States Court of Appeals, the words in the notice reading "Posted by Order of the National Labor Relations Board" shall read "Posted Pursu- ant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board." (b) Sign and furnish to the Regional Director for Region 9 sufficient copies of said notice for posting by the above-named employers, if they are willing. (c) Notify the Regional Director for Region 9, in writing, within 20 days from the date of this Order, what steps the Respondent has taken to comply herewith. APPENDIX NOTICE To MEMBERS POSTED BY ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD An Agency of the United States Government WE WILL NOT threaten, coerce, or restrain The Kroger Co., or any other person engaged in commerce, where an object thereof is to force or require such person to cease doing business with Duro Paper Bag Manufacturing Co. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNA- TIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 832 68 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation