Osho Friends Internationalv.Osho International Foundation

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Jan 13, 2009

No. 91121040 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 13, 2009)

Hearing: October 30, 2008 Mailed: January 13, 2009

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
______

Osho Friends International
v.
Osho International Foundation
_____

Opposition Nos. 91121040; 91150372; 91150379; 91152313;
91153103; 91155927; 91157465; 91157610; 91157698; and
Cancellation No. 920319321

_____

Mark I. Feldman of Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe for Osho
Friends International.

Mary M. Luria and Sara Edelman of Davis & Gilbert LLP for
Osho International Foundation.
______

Before Grendel, Cataldo and Wellington,
Administrative Trademark Judges.

Opinion by Cataldo, Administrative Trademark Judge:

Osho International Foundation (“defendant”) seeks to
register on the Principal Register the following marks, all
in typed form:
OSHO ACTIVE MEDITATIONS
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and

1 The referenced proceedings were consolidated in a series of
Board orders, the most recent of which issued on April 8, 2004.
THIS OPINION IS NOT A
PRECEDENT OF
THE T.T.A.B.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
2
training in the field of the teachings of the mystic Osho”
in International Class 41 and “spiritual counseling and
meditations” in International Class 42;2
OSHO ZEN TAROT
for “instructional books and playing cards for the game of
Tarot” in International Class 16 and “entertainment
services, namely, providing an on-line computer game” in
International Class 41;3
OSHO TRANSFORMATION TAROT
for “instructional books and playing cards for the game of
Tarot” in International Class 16 and “entertainment
services, namely, providing an on-line computer game” in
International Class 41;4
OSHO KUNDALINI MEDITATION

2 Application Serial No. 75834601 was filed October 29, 1999
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1990 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce. The application
includes a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use “ACTIVE
MEDITATIONS” apart from the mark as shown.

3 Application Serial No. 76159554 was filed November 3, 2000
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging July 1, 1995 as the
date of first use and date of first use in commerce for the goods
in International Class 16 and December 1, 1995 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce for the services in
International Class 41. The application includes a disclaimer of
the exclusive right to use “TAROT” apart from the mark as shown.

4 Application Serial No. 76159553 was filed November 3, 2000
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging November 1, 1999 as
the date of first use and date of first use in commerce for the
goods in International Class 16 and January 1, 2000 as the date
of first use and date of first use in commerce for the services
in International Class 41. The application includes a disclaimer
of the exclusive right to use “TAROT” apart from the mark as
shown.

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
3
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and
training in the field of the teachings of the mystic Osho”
in International Class 41 and “spiritual counseling and
meditations” in International Class 42;5
OSHO
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and
training in the field of the teachings of the mystic Osho”
in International Class 41;6
OSHO NADABRAHMA MEDITATION
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and
training in the field of the teachings of the Mystic Osho”
in International Class 41;7
OSHO MEDITATION RESORT

5 Application Serial No. 76060676 was filed May 31, 2000 under
Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1990 as the date of first
use and date of first use in commerce. The application includes
a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use “KUNDALINI MEDITATION”
apart from the mark as shown.

6 Application Serial No. 75683097 was filed April 15, 1999 under
Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1990 as the date of first
use and date of first use in commerce. The application includes
a statement that “OSHO” does not represent the name of a living
individual.

7 Application Serial No. 76210213 was filed February 14, 2001
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1978 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce. The application
includes a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use “NADABRAHMA
MEDITATION” apart from the mark as shown.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
4
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and
training in the field of the teachings of the Mystic Osho”
in International Class 41 and “spiritual counseling and
meditations; and providing meditation information via a
global computer information network” in International Class
42;8
OSHO MULTIVERSITY
for “educational services, namely, conducting individual
sessions, workshops, retreats, seminars, groups, courses and
training in the field of the teachings of the Mystic Osho”
in International Class 41 and “spiritual counseling and
meditations; and providing meditation information via a
global computer information network” in International Class
42;9 and
OSHO TIMES

8 Application Serial No. 76158894 was filed November 3, 2000
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 2000 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce. The application
includes a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use “MEDITATION
RESORT” apart from the mark as shown and a statement that OSHO
does not identify a living individual.

9 Application Serial No. 76158895, filed November 3, 2000 under
Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1989 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce. The application
includes a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use
“MULTIVERSITY” apart from the mark as shown and a statement that
OSHO does not identify a living individual.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
5
for “on-line periodical relating to the spiritual and
mystical teachings of the Mystic Osho” in International
Class 42.10
Defendant has also registered on the Principal Register
the following marks in typed form:
OSHO
for “prerecorded audio and video tapes in the field of
education, religion, philosophy and science” in
International Class 9;11 “education books and printed
teaching materials in the field of religion and philosophy”
in International Class 16;12 and “providing religion,
philosophy and science information via a global computer
network” in International Class 42;13 and
OSHO REBALANCING

10 Application Serial No. 76158893 was filed November 2, 2000
under Trademark Act Section 1(a), alleging 1989 as the date of
first use and date of first use in commerce. The application
includes a disclaimer of the exclusive right to use “TIMES” apart
from the mark as shown and a statement that OSHO does not
identify a living individual.

11 Registration No. 2180173 issued August 11, 1998. Section 8
affidavit accepted.

12 Registration No. 1815840 issued January 11, 1994. Section 8
affidavit accepted, Section 15 affidavit acknowledged. We note
that the Section 15 affidavit was filed prior to the commencement
of Cancellation No. 92031932.

13 Registration No. 2174607 issued July 21, 1998. Section 8
affidavit accepted, Section 15 affidavit acknowledged. We note,
however, the Section 15 affidavit was improperly filed during the
pendency of Cancellation No. 92031932.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
6
for “books and printed materials for education purpose in
the field of religion and philosophy” in International Class
16.14
Osho Friends International (“plaintiff”) has opposed
registration of defendant’s applied-for marks and seeks
cancellation of defendant’s registrations. As grounds
therefor, plaintiff alleges as follows:
the term OSHO as used in the involved alleged marks is
generic for the goods and/or services at issue;
the term OSHO as used in the involved alleged marks is
merely descriptive of the goods and/or services at issue;
the involved applications and applications underlying
the involved registrations are void ab initio because
defendant did not own the involved alleged marks on the
application filing dates;
defendant committed fraud upon the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (USPTO) by executing the declarations
in the involved applications and applications underlying the
involved registrations in which it stated that no other
person, firm, corporation or association has the right to
use the involved alleged marks when it knew of such use; and

14 Registration No. 2322901 issued February 29, 2000. Section 8
affidavit accepted; Section 15 affidavit acknowledged. We note,
however, that the Section 15 affidavit was improperly filed
during the pendency of Cancellation No. 92031932.

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
7
defendant has abandoned all proprietary interest in the
involved alleged marks.
In its answers, defendant has denied the salient
allegations of the notices of opposition and petition to
cancel.15
The Record
The record consists of the pleadings and the files of
the involved applications and registrations. In addition,
plaintiff submitted the trial testimony, with related
exhibits, of Prabhat Tiwari, leader of an Osho center in
Maryland; Rachael Freeman, board member of an Osho center in
Colorado; Sirlea Naster, leader of an Osho center in North
Carolina; Gloria Terhaar, leader of an Osho center in
California; Leonard Rosansky, leader of an Osho center in
California; Priya Hemenway, officer of an Osho center in
California; Maniko Dru Dadigan, an individual in California
associated with a number of Osho centers; and Atul Anand, a
trustee of plaintiff. Plaintiff further submitted notices
of reliance upon defendant’s responses to plaintiff’s First
and Second Requests for Admissions; defendant’s responses to
plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and First Request
for Production of Documents; selected pages of the discovery
deposition transcripts of two of defendant’s directors,

15 In addition, defendant asserted certain affirmative defenses,
but did not pursue them by motion or at trial. Accordingly, they
are deemed waived.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
8
Klaus Steeg and D’Arcy 0’Bryne; copies of articles retrieved
from the Lexis/Nexis computer database; certified copies of
official records from the United States Copyright Office;
excerpts from books containing quotes from Osho; public
records on file with the Arizona Secretary of State
regarding the American Multi-Media Corporation; and
additional selected pages of discovery deposition Klaus
Steeg.
Defendant, for its part, submitted the trial testimony,
with related exhibits, of two of its directors, Klaus Steeg
and John Andrews; one of defendant’s volunteers, Ursula
Hoess; and David Alexander, an employee of David Alexander
Publishing Ltd. Applicant further submitted notices of
reliance upon plaintiff’s responses to defendant’s First Set
of Interrogatories and Second Request for Admissions; the
discovery depositions of Atul Anand and Chaitanya Keerti,
trustees of plaintiff; printed publications, dictionary
definitions, and USPTO Trademark Electronic Search System
(TESS) printouts; certified copies of its involved
registrations; and copies of several Osho Times magazine
covers.
The parties have designated portions of the record as
“confidential.” While the information contained therein
plays a role in determining the issues before us, we are
mindful that such information was filed under seal. Thus,
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
9
we will endeavor to refer to those portions of the record
that are marked confidential only in a very general fashion.
Both parties filed main briefs on the case, and
plaintiff filed a reply brief. In addition, counsel for the
parties presented arguments at an oral hearing held before
the Board on October 30, 2008.
Evidentiary Objections
Plaintiff has filed numerous objections against
certain testimony and exhibits introduced by defendant.
Plaintiff’s objections number approximately 125; defendant
has responded to plaintiff’s objections.
None of the testimony and/or exhibits sought to be
excluded is outcome determinative. Given this fact, coupled
with the number of objections, we see no compelling reason
to discuss the objections in a detailed fashion. Suffice it
to say, we have considered all of the testimony and exhibits
submitted by the parties. In doing so, we have kept in mind
the various objections raised by the parties, and we have
accorded whatever probative value the subject testimony and
exhibits merit.
General Facts
Rajneesh Chandra Mohan was born in India in 1931.16 He
obtained a masters degree in philosophy from the University
of Sagar, located in India, and taught philosophy for nine
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
10
years at the University of Jabalpur, also located in
India.17 While serving as a professor of philosophy, he
traveled throughout India giving lectures, engaging
attendees in public debate, and introducing his meditation
techniques.18 Beginning in 1962, he began conducting guided
meditations at the end of his talks.19 As a result,
meditation camps and meditation centers began to emerge
based upon his teachings.20 In 1971, he changed his name to
Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh.21 In 1974, he moved from Bombay to
Pune, India, where he established a place of learning
dedicated to meditation and self-discovery.22 The Pune
commune was and remains a combination of 10 separate and
independent entities offering programs relating to his
teachings.23 Between 1981 and 1985, he and a number of his
followers lived in the high desert of eastern Oregon, on a
126-square mile former cattle ranch organized as a commune.
Following his deportation from the United States in 1985, he
went on a world tour to meet his followers, returning to

16 Amended petition to cancel, p.2; answer to amended petition to
cancel, p. 1.
17 Id.
18 Id.
19 Answer to amended petition to cancel, p. 2.
20 Id.
21 Id.
22 Id.
23 Steeg testimony at 603-4.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
11
Pune, India on January 4, 1987.24 Later, in 1989, he
adopted the name Osho.25 Osho died on January 19, 1990.26
Osho urged and authorized his followers to spread his
teachings as broadly as possible, throughout the world.27
To this end, his followers transcribed and recorded his
discourses and shared them with others during Osho’s
lifetime.28 In addition, Osho’s followers opened meditation
centers and camps in different parts of the world, offering
several of his meditation techniques.29 These followers
have created and offer their variations of music, cultural
and celebratory events, education and therapeutic courses,
workshops and retreats based upon Osho’s ideas.30 Some of
these followers and their centers have offered and continue
to offer publications, recordings and newsletters relating
to their activities and Osho’s ideas.31 Such centers have
also begun operating internet websites relating to the same

24 Answer to amended petition to cancel, p. 2.
25 Steeg Discovery Deposition, p. 101.
26 Answer to amended petition to cancel, p. 3.
27 Hemenway testimony at p. 13-14; Steeg discovery deposition at
99.
28 Id. at 8; Terharr Testimony at 39; Freeman Testimony at 33;
Discovery Deposition on written questions of Keerti at q. 84-87.
29 Naster Testimony at 24, 27 and 30; Tiwari Testimony at 7-9;
Dadigan Testimony at 14-15 and 114-116; Rosansky Testimony at 11;
Freeman Testimony at 8-9; and Terharr Testimony at 7-9.
30 Id.
31 Rosansky Testimony at 23-24, 77; Dadigan Testimony at 14, 21;
Freeman Testimony at 10-11; Terharr Testimony at 45; Naster
Testimony at 41-2.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
12
subjects.32 These centers operate independently and
separately from one another, without coordination by any
single source or hierarchy.33 Osho gave each center a name
as a gift and a certificate bearing such name.34 However,
Osho neither controlled nor created a hierarchy to control
or supervise these centers.35 Nonetheless, in 1989, upon
adoption of his name, Osho requested that the centers use
Osho in their names so people would recognize them as
meditation centers based upon his teachings and ideas.36
Most centers immediately complied with this request.
Plaintiff’s Standing
Plaintiff must prove its standing as a threshold matter
in order to be heard on its substantive claims. See, for
example, Lipton Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 670
F.2d 1024, 213 USPQ 185 (CCPA 1982). The purpose of the
standing requirement is to prevent mere intermeddlers from
initiating proceedings. Thus, the Federal Circuit has
enunciated a liberal threshold for determining standing,
namely, whether a plaintiff’s belief in damage has a
reasonable basis in fact and reflects a real interest in the

32 Rosansky Testimony at 16; Freeman Testimony at 13-14; Terharr
Testimony at 17-18; Naster Testimony at 50; Hemenway Testimony at
100.
33 Id.
34 Hemenway Testimony at 13-14; Naster Testimony at 22; Terharr
Testimony at 35.
35 Tiwari Testimony at 11; Dadigan Testimony at 39-40; Hemenway
Testimony at 43-4; Rosansky Testimony at 8; Freeman Testimony 12.
36 Plaintiff’s Fourth Notice of Reliance, doc. 5.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
13
case. See Ritchie v. Simpson, 170 F.3d 1092, 50 USPQ2d,
1023 (Fed. Cir. 1999). See also Jewelers Vigilance
Committee Inc. v. Ullenberg Corp., 853 F.2d 888, 7 USPQ2d
1628 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
In this case, plaintiff has established that it is an
association of individuals and centers, including members in
the United States, who are involved in spreading the
teachings of Osho and utilizing the term OSHO in so doing.37
Plaintiff’s charter charges plaintiff with preserving and
protecting the rights of its members to so use the term
OSHO.38 We find that plaintiff’s members seek, inter alia,
to make descriptive or generic use of the term OSHO for many
of the same products and services that are the subject of
defendant’s involved applications and registrations.
As a potential competitor who would use the term OSHO
generically, plaintiff has established its standing to
oppose defendant’s marks and petition to cancel its
registrations. See, e.g., Lipton Industries, supra, (One
basis for standing includes “descriptive use of term in
registered mark”); Ferro Corporation v. SCM Corporation, 219
USPQ 346, 352 (TTAB 1983) (Opposer “has a real interest
sufficient to give it standing. The rationale is that a
competitor should be free from harassment based on the
presumed exclusive right which registration of a generic

37 Anand Testimony at p. 2, 5.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
14
term would erroneously accord”) (citation omitted).
We note in addition that defendant does not dispute
plaintiff’s standing to bring the above-referenced
opposition and cancellation proceedings.
Claim of Genericness
A trademark or service mark that becomes generic is no
longer entitled to protection. See Park ‘n Fly, Inc. v.
Dollar Park and Fly, Inc., 469 U.S. 189, 105 S.Ct. 658, 83
L.Ed.2d 582 (1985). A mark is subject to cancellation on
the ground of genericness at any time, even if it is
incontestable. Id. 194-5, 105 S.Ct. at 662.
Evidence of the public’s understanding of a particular
term may be obtained from any competent source, including
direct testimony of consumers, consumer surveys, listings in
dictionaries, trade journals, newspapers, and other
publications. See Magic Wand Inc. v. RDB Inc., 940 F.2d
638, 19 USPQ2d 1551 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Merrill Lynch,
Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567 (Fed. Cir.
1987); and In re Northland Aluminum Products, Inc., 777 F.2d
1566, 227 USPQ 961 (Fed. Cir. 1985).
Evidence of Genericness
1. Use by Osho
We begin by observing that there is no evidence of
record that the individual known as Osho ever used OSHO as a

38 Id.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
15
trademark. Indeed, the parties agree that Osho never owned
or used OSHO as a mark.39 In that regard, plaintiff has
made of record a published statement in which Osho expresses
his opinion that certain practices, like meditations, do not
lend themselves to trademark protection:
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi has copyrighted
transcendental meditation and just underneath in a
small circle you will find written TM – that means
trademark!
For ten thousand years the East has been
meditating and nobody has put trademarks upon
meditations. And above all, that transcendental
meditation is neither transcendental nor
meditation…just a trademark.
I told [my secretary] to reply to these
people, “You don’t understand what meditation is.
It is nobody’s belonging, possession. You cannot
have any copyright. Perhaps if your country gives
you trademarks and copyrights on things like
meditation, then it will be good to have a
copyright on stupidity. That will help the whole
world to be relieved…Only you will be stupid and
nobody else can be stupid; it will be illegal.40

In addition, plaintiff has made of record a published
statement in which Osho indicated that he neither authorized
nor expected a single entity to serve as a source for his
teachings and ideas:
But nobody is my follower.
Nobody is going to be my successor.
Each sannyasin is my representative.
When I am dead, you all – individually – will have
to represent me to the world. There is not going
to be any pope. There is not going to be any
shankaracharya. Each sannyasin, in his own
capacity, has to represent me.41

39 Defendant’s brief, p. 45-7; plaintiff’s reply brief, p. 3.
40 Plaintiff’s Fourth Notice of Reliance, doc. 2.
41 Id., doc. 1.

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
16

Plaintiff has made of record further evidence of Osho’s
intention that his followers spread his teachings, first
utilizing his name Rajneesh and later Osho when he adopted
such name:
Q And did you ever hear Osho suggest someone
start a mediation center?

A You know, I don’t remember those specifically,
because it wasn’t part of my reality. I’m aware
that it was going on somehow.
Somehow we all knew, you know, in the course of
what was going on, that the people were coming and
people who weren’t staying were specifically told
to go back and open centers or somehow make the
work available, spread the word for other people
to come. I mean, everybody, whether they were
given specific center names or not, sort of had
that desire. And I absolutely know that people
were given names for centers and specific tasks to
do that.

Q By Osho himself?

A By Osho. …

Q Do you know personally of any instance where
Osho withdrew permission to use his name from any
center or other entity using his name?

A No.42

Q During his lifetime did Osho authorize
Sannyasins to go forth from India and to open
centers in other parts of the world?

A Yes.

Q Did he during his lifetime encourage them to
use his name on those centers which were devoted
to his teachings and his form of meditation?

A Yes.

42 Hemenway Testimony, p. 13-14.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
17

Q Did he ever retract that permission to use his
name in that way?

MS. EDELMAN: Objection to form.

A I don’t know.

Q Are you aware of any writing?

A I’m not aware.43

Q You changed the name from Rajneesh to Osho?

A Yes.

Q That coincides in the same period of time where
Osho adopted the name of Osho for himself?

A Yes.

Q You believe the same thing with the Sannyasins
that had opened centers to change it from Rajneesh
to Osho?

A Yes.

Q To your knowledge did he ever during his
lifetime retract permission for them to use the
name Osho in connection with centers devoted to
his teaching or to his meditation techniques?

A No.44

Thus, the record in this case supports a finding that
Osho himself neither claimed nor used OSHO as a trademark.
The record further supports a finding that Osho gave
permission to his followers to individually open centers
utilizing his name to spread his teachings throughout the
world. In addition, the record supports a finding that upon

43 Steeg Discovery Deposition, p. 99.
44 Id. at 101.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
18
his adoption of the name, Osho requested that such centers
utilize OSHO at the beginning of their titles so they would
be recognized as “Osho meditation centers.”45 Finally, the
record supports a finding that Osho never withdrew his
permission for such centers to refer to themselves using his
name. Such usage, while not determinative of the issue of
genericness, nonetheless illustrates that Osho did not
recognize or use OSHO as a trademark, but rather indicates
that he used and authorized others to use his name as a
generic term for his teachings and meditations rather than
as a trademark to identify a single source for goods or
services related to such teachings and meditations. As a
result, this evidence weighs in favor of genericness.
2. Dictionary Definitions and Reference Works
Plaintiff has not submitted any evidence of the term
OSHO appearing in a dictionary. Defendant, for its part,
has submitted entries from three dictionaries in which the
term OSHO does not appear at all and one in which the term
refers to Osho, the individual described above.46 Defendant
argues that such evidence “overwhelmingly directs a
conclusion that OSHO is not a generic mark.”47 We disagree.
“Dictionary definitions, while not conclusive, reflect

45 Plaintiff’s Fourth Notice of Reliance, doc. 5.
46 Steeg Testimony, Exhibit 60; Defendant’s Second Notice of
Reliance, docs. 19-20.
47 Defendant’s brief, p. 13.

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
19
the general public’s perception of a mark’s meaning and are
thus helpful in determining whether a term is generic.”
Pilates, Inc. v. Current Concepts, Inc. and Kenneth
Endelman, 120 F.Supp.2d 286, 296, 57 USPQ2d 1174, 1183 (SDNY
2000), citing Murphy Door Bed Co. v. Interior Sleep Sys.,
Inc., 874 F.2d 95, 101 (2d Cir. 1989). In this case, we
cannot determine from the evidence of record the number of
individuals who are followers of Osho. Thus, the absence of
references of any kind to OSHO in three of the four English
language dictionaries submitted by defendant may simply
reflect the relatively small number of English speaking
individuals who follow Osho and his teachings. As a result,
the dictionary evidence of record does not support a finding
that the relevant consuming public perceives OSHO either as
a generic term or a trademark. As such, this evidence is
far from conclusive on the issue of genericness.
Plaintiff has submitted the following evidence in which
OSHO appears in printed reference books:
Different religious groups have different
affirmations, renunciations, rituals, core
symbols, and dogmas that promote and maintain
personal reorganization….

For example, the Osho movement, which was
originally founded by Rajneesh, does not renounce
wealth but affirms it (Thompson and Heelas 1986).
Adherents of the movement differ from mainstream
society in the means they advocate for acquiring
wealth and the attitude they have toward using it,
but on the whole they stand with mainstream
society in contrast to more traditional religious
groups….
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
20

Some new religions argue that truth is attained by
nonpropositional revelation – that is, by
something other than a set of rational
propositions. They contend that truth has little
to do with ideas but a lot to do with meditation
or silence. As the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh puts
it, “Spirituality simply means that you have gone
beyond the mind. Ideas as such are transcended.”

Many Americans who join new religions, such as the
various meditation groups, come from upper-middle-
class homes in which intellectual and/or
professional achievements are highly valued….
(New Religions as Global Cultures, Making the
Human Sacred, Irving Hexhan and Karla Poewe
(1997);48

The Osho movement is the only movement, apart from
the Brahma Kumaris, that has a female majority in
leadership and administrative roles….

The women’s movement has been highly critical of
the master-disciple relationship for its
encouragement of female submissiveness to a male
master. The requirement to wear a mala was a
particularly regressive symbol to feminists, who
single out the Osho movement for criticism on this
score. Yet a number of women sannyasins had been
in the women’s movement prior to joining….

The predominant media image of the Osho movement
during Osho’s lifetime was of a “sex cult” led by
a “sex guru.” However, his aim was to create a
scientific yet sacramental sexuality based on a
synthesis between Tantra and Reichian
psychotherapy….

Although the “free love ethic” was normative in
the Osho movement, sexual behaviour was as varied
as elsewhere in Western society, and serial
monogamy was the predominant pattern especially
among long-term sannyasins….
(The New Age Movement, The Celebration of the Self
and the Sacralization of Modernity, Paul Heelas
(1996);49

48 Id., doc. 12.
49 Id., doc. 13.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
21

This use of OSHO in reference works is generic because
it identifies OSHO as a religious and meditative movement
and not as a trademark. Accordingly, this evidence weighs
in favor of genericness.
3. Media Usage
Plaintiff has made of record examples of use of OSHO in
various printed publications. The following examples are
illustrative:
Puttick’s research is based in Britain, where she
has personally participated in Eastern-based, New
Age, and shamanic religious practices, and was,
for five years, a disciple of the Indian guru best
known as “Osho.”…The group discussed in most depth
is the Osho movement, yet references to an
incredibly wide variety of New Religious Movements
are interspersed throughout….

Puttick describes the typical member of the Osho
movement and other Eastern-based movements as
class, well educated, professionally qualified,
has been divorced at least once, has suffered a
“personal crisis,” has been though mysticism,
drugs, politics, feminism and is “thirtyish”….

…The Osho movement stands out as promoting and
preferring women for leadership roles.
(NWSA Journal, Summer 1998);50

Now you see it, now you don’t. You read a
newspaper report that Asia Television Network
(ATN) has gone off the air, then you switch on
your television and the channel’s right there….

Though 75 per cent of the programming is film-
based, they also have religious programmes in the
morning – everything from Osho to Hindu and
Islamic themes….
(Business Line, September 15, 1997);51

50 Plaintiff’s Second Notice of Reliance., doc. 1.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
22

Fearing the apocalypse, Osho – a Hindu meditation
group formed by the late Bagwan Shree Rajneesh –
moved onto a spectacular patch of land near Alto
Paraso where it runs a type of eco-spiritual
resort.
(Sun-Sentinel [Fort Lauderdale, FL] June 2,
1999);52

The Taliban and others say they will wage a Holy
War and that the God of Islam is behind them.
So be it.
We will meet them on the fields of the holy
battleground.
But behind us, we also have a God.
The God(s) of Christianity, Judaism, Baha’i,
Mormon, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Buddhism, Hinduism,
Shinto, Confucianism, Jainism, Taoism, Sikhism,
Moonies, Hare Krishna, Zoroastrianism, Roma,
Asatru, Druidism, Wicca, Caodism, Damanhur, Druse,
Gnosticism, Lukumi, Macumb, Mowahhidoon,
Unitarians, Native Americans, New Age, Osho,
Thelem, and so many others.
Plus we have behind us, the God of true Islam.
Are they prepared?
(Intelligencer Journal [Lancaster, PA.] September
24, 2001);53

At first glance, prisons may seem an unlikely
place to find religion. There’s not much in the
way of stained glass, but plenty of security
fencing and razor wire….

But as inmates grapple with the despair and
monotony of prison life, some find religion for
the first time. Others return to the beliefs of
their childhood or the religion they abandoned as
teens and adults for more worldly and criminal
ways….

The prison population also includes five
Mennonites, one Coptic Christian, two Jainists,
one Sikh, a Confucian, 23 Unitarians and seven

51 Id., doc. 2.
52 Id., doc. 3.
53 Id., doc. 4.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
23
Quakers.

There are Druids and Wiccans, practitioners of
Shamanism, Osho, Santeria and Zoroastrianism….
(The Dallas Morning News, July 14, 2002);54

Going over the articles in this issue on Health
Consciousness, I took notes from each and every
one to include in this column. With my space
limited, however, none can be shared, but you’ll
surely find your own favorite.

Welcome New Advertisers & Newz!

-Rev. Pipsa Hos, Sound and Healing, mediator of
sound medicine and crystal bowl healing concerts.
She resides in Odessa

-Lauana Lei’s Enviro-Clay Intl., magnetic clay
detox bath kits, Mars Hill, NC

-Swami Prem Prabuddh’s Osho event (see special
events)
(Tampa Bay New Times September 1998/October
1998);55

When Pragito Dove first sat down to meditate all
those years ago in London, she never dreamed she’d
spend time in India, write a book called
“Lunchtime Enlightenment: Modern Meditations to
Free the Mind and Unleash the Spirit – at Work, at
Home, at Play.” …
“I’m a bit of a fidget, and I can’t really sit
still for very long, so those long Zen things
don’t work for me,” she says. “You can imagine
how great it was for me to be doing all this
gibberish (another Osho meditation technique) and
all this laughing or crying or dancing. I
realized I can sit there after I’ve been doing
something energetic.”
(The San Francisco Chronicle July 8, 2001);56

This evidence demonstrates use of OSHO in the media as

54 Id., doc. 5.
55 Id., doc. 7.
56 Id., doc 9.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
24
a generic term for a religious and meditative movement and
not as a trademark. “Newspaper and magazine use of a term
in a generic sense is strong evidence of genericness.”
Pilates, 120 F.Supp.2d at 300, citing Harley-Davidson, Inc.
v. Grottanelli, 164 F.3d 806, 811 (2d Cir. 1999).
4. Use by Plaintiff and Others in the Trade
In his discovery deposition, defendant’s director,
Klaus Steeg, acknowledged that in 1994 there were over 300
OSHO information and meditation centers located in 45
countries.57 Further, and despite defendant’s efforts at
enforcement, Mr. Steeg was unable to say how many of those
centers were licensed by defendant’s predecessor, or how
many centers existed at the time of his discovery
deposition.58 In addition, plaintiff has made of record
testimony and evidence of use of OSHO by its members and
third parties:
Q You testified that you changed the corporate
name of the Deepta Rajneesh Meditation Center to
Osho Deepta in 2002, 2001?

A Yes.

Q And at that time did OIF Zurich object to the
change?

A No.

Q Did Global Connections object to the change?

A No.

57 Plaintiff’s First Notice of Reliance, doc. 6.
58 Id.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
25
Q In your opinion, could the center carry on what
you have described as the purpose of the center,
in a real way, if it were not allowed to use the
word Osho to refer to those activities?

A No.

Q Why not?

MS. EDELMAN: You mean in its trade name?

MS. DUCHANE: Q To refer to the activities,
that’s the question.

A Right. Osho – I mean, Osho is like the blood
of it. If you can’t, you know, if you can’t
describe it by its substance, how can you describe
it? You know, it’s not like we could call
ourselves the Priya Meditation Center, that’s
meaningless. The fact is that it’s an Osho
meditation center. We couldn’t describe what
we’re doing as, you know, Shivanandas meditation,
they’re Osho meditations.

Q So that would be, if I understand you
correctly, partly because some of the meditation
techniques that you use are Osho’s meditation
techniques?

A Right;59

Q What kind of work do you do [at your work
address]?

A Run the Osho center.

Q Are you an Osho sannysin?

A Yes.

Q How long have you been an Osho sannysin?

A January 6, 1981.

Q Were you involved with Osho Viha [center]
during the period when Osho was still alive?

59 Hemenway Testimony, p. 46-7.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
26
A Yes.

And did the center have a legal relationship with
Osho at the time?

A No.

Q To your knowledge, did Osho ever ask Osho Viha
to sign a legal agreement with him?

A No.

Q. To your knowledge, did Osho ever establish any
kind of legal hierarchy to supervise or control
Osho Viha?

A No.

Q During the time you’ve been involved with the
center, did Osho Viha ever agree to be part of a
legal hierarchy where the center would be subject
to outside control?

A No.

Q To your knowledge, did Osho ever transfer legal
authority over the centers to anyone else?

A No.

Q Does Osho Viha use Osho in its activities?

A Yes.

Q Does – well, you’ve already testified that it
uses Osho in its activities and its name. Does it
use Osho in any other way?

A Well, Osho activities, Osho books, everything
we do is Osho.

Q What are the activities of your center, what
kind of activities does your center engage in?

A Well, we had Satsang meditation, we have
Kundalini, not at the center, but we have
Kundalini and promote it, we have musicians and
people coming through that we advertise and
promote and make them known, and of course we sell
all kinds of Osho products.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
27

Q And what is an Osho product?

A Well, Osho’s books, Osho’s meditation CDs,
Osho’s tapes.

Q Do you believe you could continue fulfilling
the purpose of your center if you were not allowed
to call the center Osho Viha?

A No. It has to be Osho. Viha you could
eliminate but you can’t eliminate Osho.

Q Why is that?

A Because everything is Osho. If there’s no
Osho, then there’s nothing.60

Osho Viha Information Center is proud to supply
books, tapes, CDs, videos, Tarot cards and other
reflections of Osho’s work, to you through this
web site. Please use the links on this page to
find the Osho material you want and contact us.
We are always happy to assist you;61

Osho Networking
Osho International Commune Information and Booking
– Call Ma Avinasho at Viha…
Osho Times Subscriptions – Call Viha OMC…
Osho Commune International…
Osho Net Computer Network…
Major Osho Centers in the USA-
Osho America-Yorba Linda, CA
Osho Bindu-Encinitas, CA
Osho Payonidhi-New York City, NY
Osho Suravi-Seattle, WA
Osho Viha-Mill Valley, CA;62

Q Are you familiar with any meditation techniques
created by Osho?

A Yes.

60 Rosansky Testimony, p. 7-28.
61 Id., Exhibit 2.
62 Id., Exhibit D.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
28
Q What’s your familiarity with those techniques?

A Well, I have done all of them for years.

Q For how many years?

A Since 1977.

Q Okay. And were you ever aware or were you ever
informed that Osho had restricted the use of his
meditation techniques by centers or individuals?

A No.

Q Were you ever aware that Osho issued a legal
license to use his meditation techniques?

A No.

Q Have you ever been informed that Osho
transferred any rights to control his meditation
techniques to anyone else?

A No.63

THE ESSENTIAL OSHO DIRECTORY
Osho Viha Information Center:
Osho Commune International:
Pune Information and Booking Center:
Osho Pages on the World Wide Web:64

In the autumn of that year I found out about the
Osho commune, Medina Rajneesh, and I immediately
booked in for the Birthday Celebration weekend.

Over a weekend in August I was attuned to Osho
Neo-Reiki Level One. The four attunements were
very special and very powerful, and the
reconnection with Osho meditations encouraged me
to dive back into sannyas.65

REIKI + OSHO = Awesome weekend
Courses – all levels, all locations. Amazing,

63 Dadigan Testimony, p. 8.
64 Rosansky Testimony, Exhibit 2.
65 Id.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
29
powerful healing in your hands & deep meditative
awareness, sensitivity, skill, as you channel this
energy. Distance sessions available. Call
today.66

Plaintiff’s evidence demonstrates generic use of OSHO
for meditative techniques and a meditative movement by
members of plaintiff who are competitors with defendant and
third-parties, including use with the permission of Osho
himself, as discussed above. Such use “by competitors and
other persons in the trade weighs strongly in favor of
genericness.” Pilates, 120 F.Supp.2d at 299.
4. Use By Defendant

Defendant has made of record numerous documents in
which it claims trademark use of OSHO and its asserted OSHO
formative marks. However, many of these same exhibits
demonstrate use of OSHO as a generic term.
Osho International Meditation Resort is a great
holiday destination where visitors can have a
direct personal experience of the Osho vision of a
new way of living with more alertness, relaxation
and fun. Located in Pune, India, the resort
attracts thousands of people from around the world
every year. Courses and workshops ranging from
creative arts and holistic health to personal
transformation and therapy are offered, as well as
a full daily schedule of meditations.67

Just released by the Harmony Imprint of Random
House (USA) this groundbreaking work brings Osho
publishing to a new level, and introduces Osho to
a new generation of readers. The Book of
Understanding is drawn from Osho’s revolutionary
and prescient talks in America, given at a time

66 Id.
67 Steeg Testimony, Exhibit 29.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
30
when Ronald Reagan was leading the country with a
cowboy mentality and a Christian fundamentalist
worldview.68

ONLY IN eBOOK FORMAT
There are several books in eBook format in English
that are not available in any other form. One of
them is a fascinating compilation of Osho insights
into the seven energy centers of the body-mind
known as “chakras.” For more information see The
Seven Vital Energy Centers.69

Osho International Foundation in Switzerland a non
profit foundation is the registered copyright
owner of all the published and unpublished Works
by Osho and the owner of other intellectual
property including the trademark OSHO and
ancillary rights, music, photos, art, images
related to Osho and/or Osho International
Foundation.

More than 22 publishing houses in more than 80
countries around the world have publishing
licenses signed with the foundation. Currently we
have 2,537 active publishing contracts in a total
of 54 languages around the world. Each contract
represents an Osho book reaching thousands of
readers. Total annual sales are now close to 3
million copies – 10 to 15 times the volume of
sales during Osho’s lifetime. In 2004 alone Osho
International signed 395 publishing agreements for
Osho titles worldwide – the equivalent of more
than one new Osho title or reprint per day.70

OSHO TIMES
OSHO MEDITATIONS FOR BUSY PEOPLE
Would you like to discover another Osho
Meditation?
Remember “I am”71

The OSHO Experience

68 Id., Exhibit 46.
69 Id.
70 Id.
71 Id.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
31
A new magazine-style coffee table presentation of
the Osho experience. This elegant, notebook-sized
production will be of interest both to those
already familiar with Osho and those wanting to
know exactly what “Osho” can mean for them
today.72

As you are interested in Osho, I am enclosing our
latest book and audio-tape lists. You can find
subscription forms for both the English and Hindi
editions of the Osho Times International magazine
included in this mailing. Subscribing to it is a
beautiful way to be in touch with what is
happening here in the commune, news about Osho and
His work from around the world. Each issue
features excerpts from Osho’s discourses, colorful
pictures and other news from the world of Osho.
In it you can also find more information about the
Osho meditation camps happening in your area. I
am sending you an English Osho Times as a gift by
separate mail.73

OSHO INTERNATIONAL
Secretariat

We received your request to open an Osho
meditation center. Recently Osho said that all
new meditation centers be called “Osho Meditation
Center.” So, the name for your center is Osho
Meditation Center.

We’ve enclosed the guidelines for His meditation
centers and your center’s name paper with this
letter. Let us know how you’re doing from time to
time.74

NEW FROM OSHO MYSTERY SCHOOL
Osho Dreamwork
Using the energy and insight contained in dreams
to further creativity and mystical transformation.
Osho Creative Leap: Out of the Gap
A seven day, four-stage leap into a new creative
surge.

72 Id.
73 Id., Exhibit 73.
74 Id., Exhibit 94.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
32
A permanent jump in understanding and creativity.
Osho Co-Dependency
As a child, one way or another, we were betrayed.
We lost touch with ourselves and with our feelings
and became false. Now, when we get close to
someone, we lose ourselves because we don’t know
who we are. We lose our personal boundaries.
This is co-dependency. The remedy is to create a
whole new way of relating.
Osho Deprogramming: Cutting the Roots of Fear
…Short and immensely powerful, it is not a
therapy, not a catharsis, not a training, not a
process. It imparts no new body of knowledge. It
is utterly new and unique. It is a transmission,
a revolution – surgical and final.
Osho Tibetan Pulsing Healing
Using hidden techniques from the monasteries of
Tibet and China, this profound energy work
involves the internal organs of the body and
brings subconscious experience to the surface,
exploding into a new awareness. It gives new
meaning to the word “release.”75

Thus, notwithstanding its claim of trademark rights in
OSHO and OSHO-formative marks, defendant itself uses OSHO as
a generic term at least for meditative techniques as well as
those related to spirituality and religion. Such use
further weighs in favor of a finding of genericness.
Analysis
In determining whether the primary significance of a
term is generic, our primary reviewing court has stated:
…[D]etermining whether a mark is generic … involves a
two-step inquiry: First, what is the genus of goods or
services at issue? Second, is the term sought to be
registered … understood by the relevant public
primarily to refer to that genus of goods or services?

H. Marvin Ginn Corporation v. International Association of

75 Id., Exhibit 105.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
33
Fire Chiefs, Inc., 782 F.2d 987, 228 USPQ 528, 530 (Fed.
Cir. 1986). See also In re American Fertility Society, 188
F.3d 1341, 51 USPQ2d 1832 (Fed. Cir. 1999). The critical
issue in genericness cases is, therefore, whether members of
the relevant public primarily use or understand the term
sought to be registered to refer to the genus or category of
goods or services in question. See In re Montrachet S.A.,
878 F.2d 375, 11 USPQ2d 1393, 1394 (Fed. Cir. 1989); In re
Merrill Lynch, supra; and Zimmerman v. National Assn. Of
Realtors, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1425 (TTAB 2004).
In some genericness cases, the specification of the
genus of goods or services is a subject of dispute. See,
e.g., In re American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, 65 USPQ2d 1972, 1981 ( TTAB 2003). In the case
at hand, we find the genus to be cogently specified by
defendant’s identifications of goods and services in the
subject registrations and applications. See In re Reed
Elsevier Properties Inc., 77 USPQ2d 1649, 1654 (TTAB 2005)
(“we consider applicant’s identification as largely defining
the genus of services involved in this case”), aff’d 482
F.3d 1376, 82 USPQ2d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Based upon the testimony and evidence of record, we
find that the primary significance of OSHO is as a religious
or meditative movement, and not as a source identifier for
goods or services. The parties do not dispute that the
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
34
mystic known as Osho developed a number of meditative
techniques, established centers to spread the teaching of
such techniques, and encouraged his followers to do the
same. Further, the evidence outlined above demonstrates
that OSHO is understood by the public to refer to these
meditation techniques as well as the meditative and
religious movement that developed around them.
We recognize that OSHO does not present a clear case of
a generic noun, but rather often appears as a generic
adjective. Certain of the evidence referenced above points
to use of OSHO as a generic noun for a religious or
meditative movement. More commonly, however, the term OSHO
appears as an adjective, directly naming the most important
or central aspect or purpose of defendant’s goods and
services, that is, that they are based upon the religious
and meditative teachings of the mystic Osho. As such, this
term is generic and should be freely available for use by
competitors. See In re Northland Aluminum Products, Inc.,
supra, (BUNDT for coffee cake held generic); In re Sun Oil
Co., 426 F.2d 401, 165 USPQ 718 (CCPA 1970) (CUSTOMBLENDED
for gasoline held generic because category of gasoline was
blended personally for the motorist); and In re Central
Sprinkler Co., 49 USPQ2d 1194, 1199 (TTAB 1998). As a
result, defendant cannot appropriate the term OSHO to
identify the source of its goods and services related to
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
35
such teachings.
As this tribunal previously held in American Montessori
Soc’y, Inc. v. Association Mostessori Internationale, 155
USPQ 591 (TTAB 1967): “it necessarily follows that if the
term ‘MONTESSORI’ is generic and/or descriptive as applied
to the ‘MONTESSORI’ teaching methods, it is equally so as
used in connection with toys, games, teaching aids, and
other material employed in connection with said methods.”
Id. at 593. See also Pilates, Inc. at 304. In this case,
because the term OSHO is generic for a series of religious
and meditative teachings, it is necessarily generic for
goods and services offered in connection therewith. See
Pilates, Inc. at 304-5. Because the evidence of record
shows that consumers identify the term OSHO with a series of
meditative and religious teachings, defendant cannot
monopolize such teachings by asserting trademark rights in
the generic term used to identify them.
“A final factor in the genericness inquiry is the
availability of other means to describe the product or
service at issue.” Pilates, Inc. at 305. In this case,
testimony and evidence of record establishes that Osho
himself requested that his followers change the names of
their centers to include OSHO so that they would be
recognized as “Osho centers.” Further testimony and
evidence establishes that the term OSHO is necessary to
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
36
describe the meditations, practices and beliefs that form
the core of the OSHO meditative and religious movement.
Several witnesses have stated that they do not, and cannot,
use any other term to describe the teachings and techniques
of OSHO. As such, the term OSHO must be freely available
for the practitioners and followers of the mystic Osho to be
able to identify their activities based upon his teachings.
Based upon the foregoing, we find the term OSHO is
generic for the meditations devised by the mystic Osho and
the meditative and religious movement arising therefrom. As
a result, defendant cannot foreclose others from utilizing
the term OSHO to describe their own goods and services based
upon such meditations and movements.
Accordingly, we grant plaintiff’s petition to cancel as
to those marks consisting in whole of the term OSHO, and
Registration Nos. 1815840; 2180173; and 2174607 will be
cancelled in due course.
Claim of Mere Descriptiveness
A term is deemed to be merely descriptive of goods or
services, within the meaning of Trademark Act Section
2(e)(1), if it forthwith conveys an immediate idea of an
ingredient, quality, characteristic, feature, function,
purpose or use of the goods or services. See, e.g., In re
Gyulay, 820 F.2d 1216, 3 USPQ2d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 1987); and
In re Abcor Development Corp., 588 F.2d 811, 200 USPQ 215,
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
37
217-18 (CCPA 1978). A term need not immediately convey an
idea of each and every specific feature of the defendant’s
goods or services in order to be considered merely
descriptive; it is enough that the term describes one
significant attribute, function or property of the goods or
services. See In re H.U.D.D.L.E., 216 USPQ 358 (TTAB 1982);
and In re MBAssociates, 180 USPQ 338 (TTAB 1973).
Whether a term is merely descriptive is determined not
in the abstract, but in relation to the goods or services
for which registration is sought, the context in which it is
being used or is intended to be used on or in connection
with those goods or services, and the possible significance
that the term would have to the average purchaser of the
goods or services because of the manner of its use or
intended use. That a term may have other meanings in
different contexts is not controlling. See In re Bright-
Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ 591, 593 ( TTAB 1979). It is settled
that “[t]he question is not whether someone presented with
only the mark could guess what the goods or services are.
Rather, the question is whether someone who knows what the
goods and services are will understand the mark to convey
information about them.” In re Tower Tech Inc., 64 USPQ2d
1314, 1316-17 ( TTAB 2002).
Finally, we note that a mark need not describe all of
the goods or services for which registration is sought.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
38
Registration must be refused if the mark is merely
descriptive of any of the goods or services for which
registration is sought. See In re Quik-Print Copy Shop,
Inc., 616 f.2d 523, 205 USPQ 505, 507 (CCPA 1980); and In re
Patent & Trademark Services Inc., 49 USPQ2d 1537, 1539 (TTAB
1998).
In this case, the above evidence of record supports a
finding that OSHO merely describes, without conjecture or
speculation, a significant characteristic or feature of
defendant’s goods and services, namely, that they involve or
are based upon the meditative techniques as well as the
meditative and religious movement arising from the teachings
of the mystic Osho.76 Indeed, the identifications of goods
and services for several of the involved marks specifically
recite “the field of the teachings of the mystic Osho” as
their subject matter.77 We further note that defendant’s
disclaimer of additional wording in many of its applied-for
marks is a concession that such wording is merely
descriptive. Moreover, the combination of OSHO and the
disclaimed, descriptive wording in the applied-for marks

76 In its brief on the merits of the case, defendant argues in the
alternative that its asserted OSHO marks have acquired
distinctiveness under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act.
However, defendant did not plead that its marks have acquired
distinctiveness in any of these consolidated proceedings.
Accordingly, the issue of acquired distinctiveness of the term
OSHO under Section 2(f) is not before us.
77 See application Serial Nos. 75834601; 76060676; 75683097;
76210213; 76158894; 76158895; and 76158893, supra.

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
39
does not create any new or different significance beyond the
merely descriptive meaning thereof.
We find, therefore, as follows:
The mark OSHO ACTIVE MEDITATIONS in application Serial
No. 75834601, consisting of the descriptive term OSHO and
the disclaimed wording ACTIVE MEDITATIONS, merely describes
a function or characteristic of the recited services,
namely, that the educational services, spiritual counseling
and meditations employ active meditation techniques created
by the mystic Osho;
The mark OSHO ZEN TAROT in application Serial No.
76159554 consists of the descriptive term OSHO, the
disclaimed term TAROT, and the term ZEN. We note that
defendant’s own evidence indicates that its instruction
books and Tarot playing cards are used for “THE
TRANCENDENTAL GAME OF ZEN.”78 We further take judicial
notice of the word “ZEN:” “An approach to religion, arising
from Buddhism, that seeks religious enlightenment by
meditation in which there is no consciousness of self.”79
Thus, we find that the mark OSHO ZEN TAROT merely describes
books and playing cards as well as an on-line computer game

78 Steeg Testimony, Exhibit 32.
79 The American Heritage New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, 3d
ed. (2005). The Board may take judicial notice of dictionary
definitions, including online dictionaries which exist in printed
format. See In re CyberFinancial.Net Inc., 65 USPQ2d 1789, 1791
n.3 (TTAB 2002). See also University of Notre Dame du Lac v. J.
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
40
employing Tarot cards combining the meditation techniques of
Zen Buddhism and Osho;
The mark OSHO TRANSFORMATION TAROT in application
Serial No. 76159553 consists of the descriptive term OSHO
and the disclaimed term TAROT. In addition, defendant’s
evidence indicates that its OSHO TRANSFORMATION TAROT
provides “insights & parables for renewal in everyday
life.”80 We further take judicial notice of the following
definition of “TRANSFORMATION:” the act or process of
transforming; the state of being transformed; change in
form, appearance, nature, or character.81 Thus, we find
that the mark OSHO TRANSFORMATION TAROT merely describes
books and playing cards as well as an on-line computer game
employing Tarot cards utilizing Osho meditative techniques
to achieve change in one’s nature;
The mark OSHO KUNDALINI MEDITATION in application
Serial No. 76060676 consisting of the descriptive term OSHO
and the disclaimed wording KUNDALINI MEDITATION, merely
describes a function or characteristic of the recited
services, namely, that the educational services, spiritual
counseling and meditations employ Kundalini meditation
techniques created by the mystic Osho;

C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., Inc., 213 USPQ 594 (TTAB 1982),
aff'd, 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
80 Id.
81 Random House Dictionary (2009).

Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
41
The mark OSHO in application Serial No. 75683097 merely
describes a function or characteristic of the recited
educational services, namely, that they provide instruction
pertaining to the teachings of the mystic Osho;
The mark OSHO NADABRAHMA MEDITATION in application
Serial No. 76210213, consisting of the descriptive term OSHO
and the disclaimed term NADABRAMHA MEDITATION, merely
describes a function or characteristic of the recited
educational services, namely, that they employ Nadabramha
meditation techniques created by the mystic Osho;
The mark OSHO MEDITATION RESORT in application Serial
No. 76158894, consisting of the descriptive term OSHO and
the disclaimed term MEDITATION RESORT merely describes a
function or characteristic of the recited services, namely,
that the educational services, spiritual counseling,
meditations and meditation information are provided at a
meditation resort employing Osho’s meditation techniques;
The mark OSHO MULTIVERSITY in application Serial No.
76158895, consisting of the descriptive term OSHO and the
disclaimed term MULTIVERSITY, merely describes a function or
characteristic of the recited services, namely that the
educational services, spiritual counseling and meditations,
and meditation information in the field of the mystic Osho
is provided at a university with several campuses;
The mark OSHO TIMES in application Serial No. 76158893,
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
42
consisting of the descriptive term OSHO and the disclaimed
term TIMES, merely describes the recited on-line periodicals
on the subject of the teachings of the mystic Osho; and
The mark OSHO REBALANCING in Registration No. 2322901
consists of the descriptive term OSHO and the term
REBALANCING. We hereby take judicial notice of the
following definition of REBALANCE: “to restore balance or
equilibrium to something.82 Thus, we find that OSHO
REBALANCING merely describes a function or characteristic of
the recited educational books and printed materials in the
field of religion and philosophy, namely, that they employ
the teachings of Osho to promote a restoration if
equilibrium.
Plaintiff’s Remaining Claims
Having found that defendant’s marks are generic and/or
merely descriptive, we do not reach the issues of whether
the applications at issue and applications underlying the
registrations at issue are void ab initio; whether the marks
in the involved applications and registrations have been
abandoned; and whether defendant has committed fraud against
the USPTO.
DECISION: plaintiff’s petition to cancel is hereby
granted on the ground of genericness as to Registration Nos.
1815840; 2180173; and 2174607. Plaintiff’s petition to

82 Webster’s New Millennium Dictionary of English (2009).
Opposition No. 91121040 et.al.
43
cancel is further granted on the ground of mere
descriptiveness as to Registration No. 2322901.
Accordingly, these registrations will be cancelled in due
course. Plaintiff’s oppositions to the registration of
application Serial Nos. 75834601; 76159554; 76159553;
76060676; 75683097; 76210213; 76158894; 76158895; and
76158893 are sustained on the ground of mere
descriptiveness.