Nora E. Hassanpour, Complainant,v.Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Federal Emergency Management Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 18, 2011
0120111988 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 18, 2011)

0120111988

08-18-2011

Nora E. Hassanpour, Complainant, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Federal Emergency Management Agency), Agency.




Nora E. Hassanpour,

Complainant,

v.

Janet Napolitano,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

(Federal Emergency Management Agency),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111988

Agency No. HS-10-FEMA-00144

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated January 25, 2011, dismissing her Equal Employment

Opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Local Hire at the Agency’s Voluntary Agency Liaison, Hurricane Ike

Recovery Office in Texas City, TX. She filed a formal complaint dated

June 1, 2010, alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination

on the basis of sex (female) when:

from January 21, 2010 through January 27, 2010, she was sexually harassed

by a male co-worker who told her he believed in people having affairs,

discussed his own extra-marital affairs, made extremely personal remarks

about her body, repeatedly asked her to lunch, and lured her into his

hotel room where he pulled her in for a hug.1

The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to timely initiate EEO

counseling. It reasoned that Complainant did not initiate EEO counseling

until April 5, 2010, beyond the 45 calendar day time limit.

According to the counselor’s report, Complainant explained that

she delayed contact because she was upset. On September 24, 2010,

the Director of the Office of Civil Rights of FEMA gave Complainant

a 15 day opportunity to further explain her emotional state, and why

it prevented her from contacting an EEO counselor within 45 days of

the “incident.” In an undated response, Complainant explained a

delay, but strongly suggested her explanation regarded delaying beyond

15 days to respond to the Agency’s inquiry and the 15 day time limit

to file an EEO complaint, which she suggested was timely postmarked.

Complainant wrote she was very emotionally disturbed by the incident,

struggled to deal with the anxiety, and was not able to sleep at night due

to paranoid insomnia, and for this reason she moved in with her in-laws.

Complainant wrote that her fiancé was in a bad car accident where he

was seriously injured with a life threatening injury and hospitalized,

and she had to take care of her three children. She wrote that she could

not function in daily tasks and routines, but was now at the point where

she could sleep.

CONTENTIONS ON APPEAL

On appeal, Complainant explains her delays, but suggests she is referring

to delays in filing papers her EEO counselor asked her to submit after

she initiated EEO counseling. After writing about her difficulty with

receiving forms from the EEO counselor and getting in touch with her to

ask questions about them, Complainant writes she had not filed an EEO

before and did not know the procedure.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

An aggrieved person must seek EEO counseling within 45 days of the

date of the alleged discriminatory action, or in the case of a personnel

action, within 45 days of the effective date of the action. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.105(a)(1) & .107(a)(2). The Agency or Commission shall extend the

45 day time limit for reasons considered by the Agency or the Commission.

Complainant explained her delays for submitting paperwork after she

initiated contact with an EEO counselor, not for waiting until April 5,

2010, to contact an EEO counselor. She does not write she was unaware of

the 45 calendar day time limit. While no doubt some of Complainant’s

explanations about her emotional state applied to delaying until April

5, 2010, she has not shown she was incapacitated from timely initiating

contact with an EEO counselor during the relevant time period, i.e., up

to March 15, 2010. Shirley v. Department of Health and Human Services

(Indian Health Service), EEOC Appeal No. 0120080798 (Sept. 2, 2010).

She submitted narratives of work events through February 1, 2010, and

in her complaint indicated she left her department on April 2, 2010,

showing she worked part or all of the period up to March 15, 2010.

Because Complainant has not shown she was incapacitated from timely

initiating EEO counseling, the Agency’s dismissal is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 18, 2011

__________________

Date

1 Based on the counselor’s report, the Agency defined the sexual

harassment as occurring from January 21, 2010 through February 1, 2010,

and that the perpetrator physically forced an embrace and kiss upon

Complainant. In her complaint, Complainant wrote the sexual harassment

occurred from January 21, 2010 through January 27, 2010. In a separate

detailed account of what occurred in the hotel room, Complaint wrote

she was pulled in for a hug, and did not write she was kissed.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120111988

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111988