Nilza I. Rivera, Complainant,v.John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 8, 2004
01A42776 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 8, 2004)

01A42776

07-08-2004

Nilza I. Rivera, Complainant, v. John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Nilza I. Rivera v. Department of the Treasury

01A42776

July 8, 2004

.

Nilza I. Rivera,

Complainant,

v.

John W. Snow,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A42776

Agency No. 042137

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated February 27, 2004, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. For the

reasons that follow, the Commission affirms the agency's dismissal of

the complaint.

Complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases

of national origin (Hispanic), color (Black), and reprisal for prior EEO

activity when she did not receive money from the agency's Bilingual Awards

Program that was given to similarly-situated bilingual agency employees,

and then was told that she would have to wait for the next budget cycle

to receive her award funds.

Complainant stated that she discovered in August, 2003, that she was

entitled to a bilingual award, which she had not received, and contacted

the union. She filed a grievance with the union later that month.

In November, 2003,complainant requested a Step-2 grievance meeting,

which was held on November 21. Complainant was told she would have to

wait until the next budget year to receive her award, and subsequently

filed an EEO claim of discrimination on December 29. The eventual

outcome of the grievance proceedings was to uphold complainant's claim

and recommend processing of an award of $450.00. Funding was approved

in January, 2004.

In its final decision, the agency dismissed the EEO claim pursuant to EEOC

Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.301(a), which provides that when a person is

employed by an agency subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121(d) and is covered by a

collective bargaining agreement that permits claims of discrimination to

be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, a person wishing to file a

complaint or grievance on a matter of alleged employment discrimination

must elect to raise the matter under either part 1614 or the negotiated

grievance procedure, but not both. An aggrieved employee who files

a grievance with an agency whose negotiated agreement permits the

acceptance of grievances which allege discrimination may not thereafter

file a complaint on the same matter under this part 1614 irrespective

of whether the agency has informed the individual of the need to elect

or whether the grievance has raised an issue of discrimination.

As the agency noted in its final decision, any claims complainant raises

in her EEO complaint could have been raised during the grievance process.

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint

process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998);

Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585

(September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for complainant to have

raised her challenges to actions which occurred during the grievance

process was during those proceedings. Accordingly, the agency's final

decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 8, 2004

__________________

Date