Naresh Chawla, Complainant,v.Dr. David Satcher, Surgeon General Acting Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 6, 2001
01994411 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 6, 2001)

01994411

02-06-2001

Naresh Chawla, Complainant, v. Dr. David Satcher, Surgeon General Acting Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.


Naresh Chawla v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

01994411

February 6, 2001

.

Naresh Chawla,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. David Satcher, Surgeon General

Acting Secretary,

Department of Health and Human Services,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01994411

Agency No. FDA-C-025-98

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency

decision dated April 5, 1999, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.<1>

In his complaint, complainant claims he was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of race, national origin, color, religion, age, and reprisal

(for filing a prior EEO complaint under Title VII and the ADEA), when:

On May 30, 1997, he was issued a proposed seven-day suspension;

On May 30, 1997, his supervisor gave him the letter regarding a proposed

seven-day suspension; and,

During May 1997, he was subjected to non-sexual harassment.

In its decision, the agency first dismissed claims 1 and 2 on the

grounds that they constituted only a proposal to take an adverse action.

The agency next dismissed claim 3 on the grounds that it was the same

claim raised by complainant in a pending EEO complaint, identified as

Complaint No. FDA-053-97.

On appeal, complainant acknowledges that the agency's dismissal regarding

claim 3 was proper. Consequently, we shall not further address claim

3 herein and AFFIRM the agency's decision to dismiss claim 3.

However, complainant argues that the agency improperly dismissed

claims 1 and 2, because the agency subsequently issued a decision to

suspend complainant for seven days based on its May 30, 1997 proposal. As

evidence, complainant submits a copy of the agency's �Decision to Suspend�

memorandum dated February 13, 1998. The agency has not submitted a

response to complainant's appeal.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides, in part,

that the agency shall dismiss a complaint that alleges that a proposal to

take a personnel action, or other preliminary step to taking a personnel

action, is discriminatory. However, we note that when a complaint is

filed on a proposed action and the agency subsequently proceeds with

the action, the action is considered to have merged with the proposal.

See Siegel v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05960568

(October 10, 1997); Charles v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request

No. 05910190 (February 25, 1991).

Review of the February 13, 1998 �Decision to Suspend� memorandum confirms

complainant's contention that it implements the May 30, 1997 proposed

seven-day suspension. Therefore, we find that these actions merged when

the decision to suspend was issued to complainant. We note, however,

that claim 1 and claim 2 appear to raise the identical issue, i.e.,

whether complainant was subjected to discrimination when he was issued

a seven-day suspension ultimately on February 13, 1998, and only one

claim regarding the subject suspension should be processed. Accordingly,

we REVERSE the agency's dismissal of the claim regarding the seven-day

suspension of February 13, 1998 and REMAND the identified claim to the

agency for further processing as set forth in the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 6, 2001

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.