Najwa U. Kirkendall, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 30, 2002
05A21102 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 30, 2002)

05A21102

10-30-2002

Najwa U. Kirkendall, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Najwa U. Kirkendall v. Department of the Army

05A21102

October 30, 2002

.

Najwa U. Kirkendall,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Request No. 05A21102

Appeal No. 01A13491

Agency No. AVBWRE9812I0400

Hearing No. 350-99-8148

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Najwa U. Kirkendall (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Najwa U. Kirkendall v. Department of the Army, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A13491 (July 19, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In her underlying complaint, complainant alleged she was discriminated

against on the bases of race (African-American), color (black), and

reprisal for prior protected EEO activity, in violation of Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. �

2000e et seq., when her duty hours were reduced between October 1996

and April 1997, and she was removed from her position in April 1997.

The EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) held a hearing and issued a decision

finding that complainant failed to meet her burden of establishing that

the agency's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons were mere pretext for

discriminatory or retaliatory animus. The agency's final agency decision

(FAD) adopted the findings of the AJ. On appeal, the Commission affirmed

the FAD.

In her request for reconsideration, complainant reiterates arguments

previously made on appeal. Therefore, after a review of complainant's

request for reconsideration, the previous decision, and the entire

record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the

criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A13491

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 30, 2002

__________________

Date