Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 7, 194350 N.L.R.B. 163 (N.L.R.B. 1943) Copy Citation In the Matter Of MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED and MAIL ORDER , WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION WORKERS UNION, I. L. W. U., C.I.O. Case No. R-5200.-Decided June 7, 1943 Mr. D. M. Norton, of Chicago, Ill., for the Company. , Messrs. I. Duke Avnet, Harold Buchman, and John Brinton, of Baltimore, Md., for the I. L. W. U' Messrs. Charles Walters, Joseph Conlon,. and Nat Klein, of Balti- more, Md., for the United. Mr. Joseph Gillis, of Baltimore, Md., for the AFL. Mr. Glenn L. Moller, of counsel to the Board. e, DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Mail Order, Warehouse and Distri- bution Workers Union, I. L. W. U., C. I. 0., herein called the ILWU, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen con- cerning the representation of employees of Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, Baltimore, Maryland, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Frank A. Mouritsen, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Baltimore, Maryland, on April 14, 15, and 16, 1943. The Company, the ILWU, United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, herein called the United, and the Ameri-, can Federation of Labor, herein called the AFL, appeared and par- ticipated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. The Company, V the ILWU, and the United have filed briefs which the Board has considered. The United filed a motion to amend the record to change the date of a conference of the two C. I. O. - unions, 50 N. L R. B., No. 32. 163 164 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD stated by a witness for the United to-have been January 19, to Feb- ruary 12, 1943. The motion is granted. The United also filed motions for oral argument and to dismiss the petition. The-motion for oral argument is hereby denied: The motion to dismiss the peti- tion is also denied, for the reasons set forth hereafter. The ILWU ,moved for leave to- amend its petition to alter the description of the unit. The motion is hereby granted. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT ' I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Montgomery Ward Co., Incorporated, an Illinois corporation with its principal office in Chicago, Illinois,' is engaged in the dis- tribution and sale of general merchandise throughout the United States through mail-order houses and retail stores. TheteCompany operates about 9 mail-order houses, 650 retail stores, more than 200 catalog-order offices, about 4 factories and a ,large number of ware- houses. In Baltimore, Maryland, the Company operates a mail- order house, 3 attached mail-order warehouses, 1 retail store, and a retail pool which is a centralized supply warehouse for retail stores in the surrounding region. Only the Company's Baltimore, opera- tions are involved in this proceeding. For the fiscal year ending January 31, 1943, the mail-order house in Baltimore purchased goods and merchandise valued at about $27,000,000, of which $26,000,000 represented purchases from 'vendors outside the State of Maryland. During the same period, the Balti- more retail store purchased goods' end merchandise valued in excess -of $6,000,000, 'all but $25,000 of which was purchased from vendors outside the State of Maryland. All of these goods and merchandise were shipped to the retail pool from whence they were turned over to the retail store. During the same fiscal period, the mail-order house sold and shipped to customers goods and merchandise valued in excess of $34,- 000,000, all but $4,000,000 of which represented goods and merchan- dise sold and delivered to customers outside the State of Maryland. Nearly all of the sales of the retail store were to Maryland 'customers. The Company admits that as to its mail -order operations, it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. We find that the Company is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act, not only as to its mail -order opera- tions , but as to its retail pool and retail store as well. V l' ' MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED 165 II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Mail Order, 'Warehouse and Distribution Workers Union, char- tered by the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America,-affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. The American Federation of Labor, is a labor organization, ad- mitting to membership employees of the Companay. M. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On February 18, 1943, the ILWU requested recognition by the Company as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees of the mail-order house. The Company refused to extend such recognition until the ILWU has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Field Examiner for the Board and a supplemental statement of the Trial Examiner, introduced into evidence, indicate that the ILWU represents, a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate., The United contends that the petition should be dismissed on the ground that°a jurisdictional dispute exists between the United and the ILWU. It is to be noted, however, that there is a third labor organization involved in this proceeding, not affiliated with the parent body of the ILWU and the United. We find no merit in the United's ,contention.z 1 The Field Examiner reported that the ILWU submitted 953 authorization cards, 354 of which bear the apparently genuine signatures of persons whose names appear on the Company's pay roll of February 25, 1943, and who are within the appropriate unit. 'There are approximately 1,190 employees in the appropriate unit. Toward the conclusion of the hearing the ILWU submitted to the Trial Examiner 41 additional authorization cards, 10 of which bear the apparently genuine signatures of persons whose names appear on the Company,'s pay roll of February 25, 1943, and who are within the appropriate unit The parties stipulated that the Trial Examiner might compare these additional cards with the pay roll and make a statement as to the results of such comparison after the close of the hearing , and that the Board might order that the said statement be incorporated into the record . It is so ordered. ` The United submitted 11 cards bearing the names of persons on the Company pay roll in the unit sought by the United, 6 of whom are in the unit sought by the ILWU. There are between 3,400 and 3 , 500 employees in the unit sought by the United.' The AFL submitted 29 cards, 6 of which bore the ' names of persons on the Company pay roll in the unit which the AFL claimed to be appropriate, 3 of which were in the unit sought by the ILWU. There are approximately 3,893 employees in the unit which the AFL claimed to be appropilate. 2 See Matter of Long-Bell Lumber Company and International Association of Machinists Local No. 1350, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, 16 N. L R B 892; Matter of Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co and Local 539, International Union, United Automobile Workers of Almerica, C. I. 0., 32 N L. R . B. 416. 536105-44-12 166 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR, RELATIONS BOARD We find, that a question affecting commerce has arisen 'concerning the.representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of^Section 9 (c)' and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The ILWU, in its amended petition, contends that all employees who handle merchandise or; perform physical labor in the mail-order house, excluding executives, confidential employees, supervisors, cler- ical employees, buyers and rebuyers, skilled maintenance employees, and employees in the jewelry repair department, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. The Company- contends that the appropriate unit consists of all employees of the mail-order house and retail pool, excluding only the house manager, merchandise manager, the, comptroller, and the employees 'in the medical department. The United contends that the unit sought by the Company is appropriate, the only difference being that the United would exclude the department heads and the em- ployees in various technical and managerial departments. The AFL seeks a unit comparable to that sought by the United, including in the unit, however, the employees in the retail store. The mail-order house is under the supervision of a house manager. Directly responsible to him are the personnel department, medical department, inspection department, and industrial engineering de- partment. The business of the mail-order house is conducted through three major groups, each composed of a large number of depart- ments or divisions. These groups are the merchandise group, oper- ating group, and the controller's or bookkeeping group. Each group is supervised by a group manager who is responsible to the house manager. The merchandise group is the purchasing branch of the Company's operations. Its function is to purchase all the merchan- dise which the Company sells to its customers. '' Although most of the employees in this group do not handle merchandise, some of them do, and hence come within the ILWU's definition of the ap- propriate unit. The operating group is composed of the many divi- sions which handle the selling part of the business. Merchandise is divided into various groupings or categories and each category or a group of categories is handled by one of the many divisions in the operating group. Thus, men's shirts are handled by one divi- sion, radios by another. Most of the `employees, who handle mer- chandise are in the operating group, and clerical employees in these departments are in the minority. The controller's group is com- posed of the various clerical) and bookkeeping divisions such as ac- counting, credit, billing, time-payment divisions, and others of' like k MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED 167 nature. Most' of the employees in this group do only clerical work, but a few handle merchandise. Each of the many divisions and departments is under the supervision of a department head or super- intendent. Some of the superintendents supervise several divisions. Assisting the superintendents and department heads in the man- agement of the divisions are various' supervisors. Although em- ployees are originally employed through the personnel department, their suitability for the work in the department to which they are assigned is determined by the department head or superintendent, who may refuse to accept an individual in his division. The depart- ment heads and superintendents have authority to discharge and dis- cipline while the supervisors have authority to recommend such action. We shall exclude them from the unit. The principal dispute between the ILWU and the other parties hereto is as to whether clerical employees are appropriately; excluded from the unit. The ILWU has confined its organizational activity to.,employees who handle merchandise or do manual labor, and there is no showing that any labor organization has effectively organized the clerical employees. We are of the opinion that the clerical em- ployees are properly excluded and that the unit, consisting essentially of manual workers, sought by the ILWU is appropriate.3 However, in the light of the detailed testimony with respect to the duties and -functions of the numerous classifications of employees in each divi- sion of the Company's operations, we regard the,description of the unit suggested by the ILWU as too general. In order to avoid con- fusion and uncertainty in the identification of employees in the appropriate unit, we shall redefine the unit in terms of the depart- ments or divisions and, where necessary, job classifications, listed in the Appendices hereto. The retail pool and retail store are housed in the same building' with the mail-order house. The retail store, however, is operated entirely separately from the mail-order house. Its management is separate; there is no interchange of employees; and there is no inter- change of merchandise. The ILWU has made no attempt to or- ganize the employees of the retail store. We shall exclude them from the appropriate unit. The retail pool, however, although nomi- nally under separate management, is serviced by many of the depart- ments and divisions of the mail-order house; the employees of the', retail pool do the same kind of work as the mail-order employees; and their wage scales and working conditions are the same as those ® See also the'following cases in which we found appropriate units similar to that sought by the ILWU. Matter of Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated and Local 215, Mast Order, Warehouse and Distribution Workers, I. L W. U., C. 1 0., 44 N. , L R B 694 Matter of Montgomery Ward & Company and Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 26) afli- ated with I. B. of T. C. S. & S of A., A. F. of L., 24 N. L. R B 967. 168 DECISIONS OF NATIO'N'AL LABOR, RELATIONS BOARD ,prevailing in the mail-order house. Because of their close relation to the employees of the mail-order, house and the close functional integration of the two operations we shall include, them in the unit, .excluding supervisory and clerical employees. Group leaders, whom all,the parties wish to- include in. the unit, spend 80 percent of their time doing the same kind of work as the employees with whom they work. We find that they do not have such substantial supervisory -authority as to require their exclusion from the unit. - Their inclusion in or exclusion from the unit will depend upon the inclusion or exclusion of the employees with whom they work. I , . The ILWU seeks to exclude the employees of the cafeteria, while the Company, United, and AFL would include them. There is no evidence that any of the unions has attempted to organize them, and they have evinced no present interest in self-organization. Since they are differentiated functionally from the other employees in the unit, and have expressed no desire for self-organization, we shall exclude them from the unit., We find that the employees in all the departments and divisions listed in Appendix -A, excluding department heads, supervisors, typists, and stenographers, record clerks (grades 1, 2 and 3), time- keepers, instructors, catalog sales clerks, technical sales clerks, clerks, correspondents, merchandisers, junior merchandisers, ediphone oper- ators, information clerks, pricers, sign-out clerks, file clerks, production clerks,- adjusters, accuracy control clerks, listers, production-control .clerks, calculator operators, and watchmen; and the specifically named categories of employees set -forth, in Appendix C; but excluding all employees in the-departments listed in Appendix B and all employees in the departments set forth in Appendix C except-the categories of employees specifically listed therein, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation when has arisen be resolved by, an election by secret ballot among the, employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction .4 Although the membership showings of the United and the AFL ' The Company requested that the pay -roll period immediately preceding the election be used as the basis of eligibility to vote No reasons are advanced by the Company to justify this departure from our customary practice. The request is denied: 'MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED 169 are shall, their interest in the Company's employees dates back over a, considerable period of time.5 We shall permit them to appear on the ballot. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby. DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, Baltimore, Maryland, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Fifth Region, acting in this matter as agent for,the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 10, of said Rules -and Regulations, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they,desire to be' represented by Mail Order, Warehouse and Distribution Workers Union, chartered by the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or by United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, or by the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by none of said unions. APPENDIX A DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS INCLUDED 1. Shipping and Receiving (Including trucking & freight elevator operators). 2. Packing. f Cf. Matter of Thomasville Chair Company and Upholsterers International Union, Local 308, A. F. of L.,,37 N. U. R. B. 1017; Matter of Weyerhaeuser Timber Colmpany and Inter- national Association of Machinists, Lodge No. 1473, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, 30 N. L. R. B. 872. Both the United and the AFL attempted to organize the Company as early as 1940. 170 DBOISIONS.' OF NATIONAL' LABOR RELATIONS BOARD -.3. Central Repair & Div. 88 (Repair parts). ' 4. Merchandise Divisions 15, 25, 40, 42. 5. Merchandise Divisions 23, 24, 26, 30. 6. Merchandise Divisions 29, 31, 32, 36. 7. Merchandise Divisions 75,76, 85,-86. 8. Merchandise Divisions 60, 61, 62, 64. 9. Outside Warehouse. 10. Attached Pit and Warehouse. 11. Merchandise Divisions 46, 68, 81, 83, 84, 87. 12. Merchandise Divisions 66, 72. ' 13.' Merchandise Divisions 45, 51, 53, 57 .6 ,14. Merchandise Divisions 16, 17, 18,, 71. 15. Package opening. 16. Retail Pool. 17. Pitsburgh Outside Warehouse. 18. Porters and matrons. 19. Supply. APPENDIX B DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS EXCLUDED 1. Manager 2. Personnel 3. Training 4. Medical 5. Inspection 6. Industrial Engineering '7. Merchandise Manager 8. Stock Record 9. Operating Manager El tPassenger eva or10. 11. Telephone & Telegraph- 12. Cafe 13. Adjustment & Sales Engineer 14. Order Clerical 15. Controller 16. Chief Accountant 17. Accounts Payable & Merchan- dise Transfer 18. Accounting & Statistical 19. Catalog Order Control 20. Order Control 21. Protection 22. Chief Cashier ,23.' Mail Opening 24. General Cashiers 25. Budgetary Control 26. Time Payment 27. Credit Order 28. Engineering 7 29. Jewelry Repair 30. 'House Communications 31. Multigraph Excluding the jewelry repair department (See Appendix B). 4 The Engineering Department, or boiler room employees, have already been established by the Board as a separate unit. See Matter of Montgomery Ward & Company and Inter- national Union of Operating Engineems,'Locals ' 272 & 272A, 29 N. L. It. B. 1120. I 11 MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED 171 APPENDIX C SPECIAL CASES Departments excluded,' but specifically named categories of em- ployees included. 1. Inspection -auditors -packers 2. 5 groups'of Merchandising Division, known as the Stock Con- trol Dept.. -stock helpers' -stockmen -return clerks -bin filler' 3. Traffic -freight handlers -receiving & shipping checkers 4. Catalog Order -porters ' -packers B -tube clerks -checkers Gr. 1 5. Billing - -billing-scalers -porters 6. Normal Maintenance -stockmen -laborers (who haul coal) -messengers -tube clerks 7. Index and Publicity -order fillers -stock helpers ' Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation