Monica R. Sookdeo, Complainant,v.Pete Geren, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 3, 2008
0120083009 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 3, 2008)

0120083009

12-03-2008

Monica R. Sookdeo, Complainant, v. Pete Geren, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Monica R. Sookdeo,

Complainant,

v.

Pete Geren,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083009

Agency No. ARCARSON08MAR01357

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from a final agency

decision (FAD) dated May 7, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In her

complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination

based on her sex (female) when she was sexually harassed by a co-worker

from December 26, 2007 to January 10, 2008. At the time of her complaint,

complainant served as a health systems technician.

The FAD dismissed the complaint for failure to timely initiate contact

with an EEO counselor. It reasoned that complainant initiated this

contact on March 17, 2008, beyond the 45 calendar day time limit for

doing so. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) and .107(a)(2).

Complainant spoke to a manager on or about January 11 and 14, 2008,

which the agency's opposition to complainant's appeal identifies as

her supervisor, about the alleged sexual harassment. According to

complainant, the supervisor responded that he would call EEO office

to see what proper steps needed to be taken to start the process.

Thereafter, on January 30, 2008, complainant was notified that there

would be a Commander's Inquiry of her claim. While this was an internal

administrative investigation, complainant informed the EEO counselor that

she believed it was an EEO investigation. When complainant learned on

March 17, 2008, that the Commander's Inquiry concluded without a finding

of harassment, she contacted an EEO counselor the same day.

According to what appears to be EEO counselor notes, the supervisor said

that in response to complainant's claims that he called an EEO counselor

outside complainant's presence to learn of his responsibilities, and

never told complainant this covered her. According to the EEO counselor,

complainant said the supervisor called the EEO office to see what he

should do as a manager about sexual harassment in the workplace.

The time limit to initiate contact with an EEO counselor can be

extended for reasons considered sufficient by the agency or Commission.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(2). Complainant argues that she believed the EEO

process commenced upon her contact with her supervisor. In opposition

to complainant's appeal, the agency argues that the supervisor's actions

should not extend the time limit to initiate EEO counseling because

he contacted an EEO counselor to learn of his responsibilities, and

never told her she was covered by his contact. The agency argues that

nothing about the Commander's Inquiry should have confused complainant

into believing it was an EEO investigation.

Dowdy v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120083106 (September

19, 2008), concerned a sexual harassment complaint by a co-worker

of complainant who had the same supervisor and involved the same

alleged perpetrator. The Commission reversed the agency's dismissal

for untimely EEO contact. In strikingly similar facts, the complainant

in Dowdy contended that when she informed the supervisor of the alleged

sexual harassment, he stated he would contact the EEO office to see how

to proceed. In light of this, it ruled that the complainant exhibited

her intent to begin the EEO process when she contacted her superior

about her concerns on January 11, 2008.

Like in Dowdy, we find sufficient reason to extend the time limit to

initiate EEO counseling. Complainant wrote that the supervisor said

he would call EEO office to see what proper steps needed to be taken

to start the process, and there is no statement in the record by the

supervisor denying this. The Commander's Inquiry followed shortly

thereafter, likely creating more confusion in complainant's mind.

We find that the agency unintentionally misled complainant to believe

the EEO process had been initiated on January 11, 2008.

Accordingly, the FAD is reversed.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney

with the

Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 3, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083009

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120083009