01a40031
03-16-2005
Mohammad Zahid, Complainant, v. Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary, Department of Energy, Agency.
Mohammad Zahid v. Department of Energy
01A40031
March 16, 2005
.
Mohammad Zahid,
Complainant,
v.
Samuel W. Bodman,
Secretary,
Department of Energy,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A40031
Agency Nos. 01(79) CH & 01(104) CH
Hearing Nos. 210-A2-6274X & 210-A2-6275X
DECISION
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's
appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.
Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him, in
violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),
as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.,
on the bases of national origin (Pakistan), religion (Islam), age
(D.O.B. 1/11/45), and reprisal for prior EEO activity when: (1) on April
25, 2001, he was not selected for the position of General Engineer,
GS-801-14, under Vacancy Announcement No. CH-00-30 ("Fermi position");
and (2) on May 22, 2001, he was not selected for the position of General
Engineer, GS-801-14, under Vacancy Announcement No. Ch-01-05 ("Brookhaven
position").
An EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) determined that no genuine issues
of material fact or credibility existed with regard to the Brookhaven
position and issued a summary judgment decision in favor of the agency
with respect to this claim. A hearing took place with respect to the
Fermi position. After the hearing, the AJ concluded that complainant
failed to prove discrimination by a preponderance of the evidence.
After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order
implementing the AJ's decisions. The AJ's issuance of a decision without
a hearing with respect to claim 2 was appropriate and a preponderance
of the record evidence does not establish that discrimination occurred.
With respect to claim 1, we find that the AJ's ultimate findings, that
unlawful employment discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of
the evidence, is also supported by the record.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
March 16, 2005
__________________
Date