Michael R. Moorev.Department of Agriculture 01992962 01-04-01 .Michael R. Moore, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 4, 2001
01992962 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 4, 2001)

01992962

01-04-2001

Michael R. Moore v. Department of Agriculture 01992962 01-04-01 .Michael R. Moore, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Michael R. Moore v. Department of Agriculture

01992962

01-04-01

.Michael R. Moore,

Complainant,

v.

Daniel R. Glickman,

Secretary,

Department of Agriculture,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01992962

Agency No. 970106

DECISION

On February 25, 1999, Michael R. Moore (hereinafter referred to as

complainant) initiated an appeal to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (Commission) with regard to his complaint of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1> The final agency decision was received by

complainant on January 30, 1999. Accordingly, the appeal is timely, and

is accepted by this Commission in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

Complainant contacted an EEO Counselor in November 1996, and subsequently

filed a formal complaint, alleging that he had been discriminated

against on the basis of his race (white) when he was reassigned from the

position of Underwriting Services Branch Chief. In its final decision

dated January 7, 1999, the agency dismissed the complaint for failure

to state a claim. It is from this decision that complainant now appeals.

The EEOC Regulations provide for the dismissal of a complaint which

fails to state a claim. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a). An agency shall accept

a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who

believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency

because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling

condition. 29 C.F.R.� 1614.103. The Commission's federal sector case

precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers

a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. Riden v. Department of the

Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970314 (October 2, 1998).

In the case at hand, we find that the matter at issue is not within

the purview of the EEOC Regulations. The record shows that, following

complainant's selection for the position in question in 1992, another

candidate (Black) filed an EEO complaint alleging that the action

was discriminatory. An EEOC Administrative Judge ultimately issued

a decision finding that the co-worker had in fact been subjected to

discrimination. The agency adopted the Administrative Judge's decision,

and retroactively placed the co-worker into the position. The agency's

action was consistent with the EEOC Regulations. Accordingly it is the

decision of the Commission to AFFIRM the final agency decision.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

__________________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

___01-04-01_______________________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify

that the decision was mailed to claimant, claimant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_________________________

Date

_________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.