Michael J. Smith, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 16, 2004
01a44526 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 16, 2004)

01a44526

11-16-2004

Michael J. Smith, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Agency.


Michael J. Smith v. Department of Defense

01A44526

November 16, 2004

.

Michael J. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A44526

Agency No. 04WHS008

DECISION

On February 26, 2004, complainant filed a formal EEO complaint wherein

he claimed that he was discriminated against on the bases of race

(Caucasian), color (white), sex (male), religion (Catholic), national

origin (North American), and age (46) when he was not selected for

the positions of Program Analyst, NH-343-IV, Vacancy Announcement

WHS-03-7356-TG and Program Analyst, NH-343-IV, Vacancy Announcement

WHS-03-7780-BT.

By decision dated June 22, 2004, the agency dismissed the complaint on

the grounds of mootness. The agency determined that on February 19,

2004, a Human Resources Specialist provided complainant with a detailed

explanation of the reasons he was not selected for the positions at issue.

The agency stated that complainant did not describe the actions or

practices that form the basis of his complaint or the corrective actions

he was seeking. According to the agency, its EEO Office requested in

letters dated February 26, 2004 and March 31, 2004 that complainant

clarify his complaint.

On appeal, complainant maintains that the agency did not provide him

with sufficient relief Complainant argues that he was not provided with

feedback that addresses his desire to be informed of his weaknesses.

In response, the agency asserts that complainant was provided with the

specific constructive feedback that he requested as a remedy. The agency

maintains that appropriate agency officials informed complainant why he

was not seriously considered and why he was ultimately not selected for

the subject positions. The agency argues that complainant's displeasure

at the content of the feedback does not preclude mootness. According to

the agency, the alleged violation cannot recur because the position

vacancies at issue have been filled. The agency further argues that its

provision of the requested feedback irrevocably eradicated the effects

of the nonselections.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(5) provides for

the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot.

To determine whether the issues raised in complainant's complaint are

moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with

assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged

violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely

and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.

See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998).

When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for

a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

Upon review of the record, we find that the agency improperly

dismissed complainant's complaint. Initially, we note that the agency's

determination that the instant complaint lacks clarity is not justified

in light of the fact that the complaint is clearly defined in both the

EEO Counselor's report and the agency's final action. The complaint

concerns complainant's nonselections for the position of Program

Analyst under two separate vacancy announcements. It can not be said

that providing complainant with information concerning his nonselection

and the selection process was sufficient to eradicate the effects of

the alleged discrimination. The relief provided by the agency did not

offer complainant the position at issue or a comparable position. We

find that the effects of the alleged violation were not eradicated,

and consequently complainant's complaint has not been rendered moot.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint

was improper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) and is REVERSED.

This complaint is hereby REMANDED for further processing pursuant to

the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 16, 2004

__________________

Date