Michael H. Bostron, Complainant,v.Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 3, 2000
05990823 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 3, 2000)

05990823

08-03-2000

Michael H. Bostron, Complainant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Michael H. Bostron v. Social Security Administration

05990823

August 3, 2000

Michael H. Bostron, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05990823

) Appeal No. 01980252

Kenneth S. Apfel, ) Agency No. 97-0547-SSA

Commissioner, )

Social Security Administration, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The agency initiated a timely request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission to reconsider the decision in Bostron v. Social Security

Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01980252 (June 3, 1999).<1> The

Commission, in its discretion, may grant a party's request to reconsider

a decision issued under the regulation set forth at 64 Fed. Reg 37,644,

37,659 (1999) (to be codified as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a)), if the party

demonstrates that:

The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of

material fact or law; or

The decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices

or operations of the agency.

64 Fed. Reg 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified as and hereinafter

cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)).

The agency dismissed the portion of the complaint alleging that

complainant was discriminated against when: (1) the agency pursued

a continuing systemic discriminatory policy against all males and

particularly White males 40 years of age and older in hiring, ratings,

awards, and promotions; (2) he was denied his EEO representative of

choice; and (3) he can not receive fair and impartial processing of

his EEO complaint. The agency dismissed these claims on the grounds

that these claims stated the same claims that are pending before the

Commission. The previous decision found that the agency failed to supply

a copy of the EEO complaint file at issue. The previous decision reversed

the dismissal of the complaint.

In the agency's request to reconsider the previous decision, the agency

has submitted, for the first time, a copy of the administrative EEO

complaint file. The agency has also submitted a copy of a civil action

complaint which the agency argues encompasses the matters raised in

the administrative EEO complaint. The Commission shall reconsider

the previous decision on our own motion. The copy of the civil action

complaint submitted by the agency shows that the matters raised in

the instant complaint are encompassed in the civil action. Therefore,

Commission processing of the matter shall be terminated pursuant to the

regulation set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (to be codified as 29

C.F.R. � 1614.409). The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01980252 is REVERSED.

There is no further right of administrative appeal from a decision of

the Commission on a request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0400)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

August 3, 2000

________________ ______________________________

DATE Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_____________________ _________________________

DATE

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.