Michael H. Bostron, Appellant,v.Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 3, 1999
01990679 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 3, 1999)

01990679

06-03-1999

Michael H. Bostron, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Michael H. Bostron v. Social Security Administration

01990679

June 3, 1999

Michael H. Bostron, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990679

) Agency No. 98-0635-SSA

Kenneth S. Apfel, )

Commissioner, )

Social Security Administration, )

Agency. )

___________________________________)

DECISION

Appellant filed the instant appeal from the agency's September 18, 1998

decision dismissing a portion of appellant's complaint (allegations 1 -

3 (nonselections)) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) for untimely EEO

Counselor contact and a portion of appellant's complaint (allegation 4

- improper processing of complaint) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)

for failing to state a claim.

As an initial matter the Commission finds that the agency properly

defined the allegations in the complaint.

Allegations 1 - 3

Regarding the nonselections the agency found that appellant was

constructively notified of his nonselections through the posting of

the selectees' names on bulletin boards on January 18, 1998; March 1,

1998; and March 15, 1998. The agency found that appellant initially

contacted an EEO Counselor on June 4, 1998. Appellant argues that he

did not become aware of his nonselection for two positions until June

2, 1998 and for the other position on June 4, 1998. Appellant argues

that he became aware of the three nonselections upon his contact of a

personnel specialist. On appeal appellant argues that the "bulletin

boards postings are sporadic at best and do not contain information

necessary for Appellant to file a complaint." The agency has not

supplied any evidence in the record showing if and when the selections

at issue were posted on a bulletin board. Therefore, it is not clear

when appellant should have reasonably suspected that he was not selected

for discriminatory reasons. The Commission shall remand allegations 1 -

3 so that the agency may supplement the record with evidence showing if

and when the selections at issue were posted on a bulletin board.

Allegation 4

Regarding allegation 4 we find that the portion of allegation 4

alleging that appellant was denied his choice of representative is

properly dismissed pursuant to �1614.107(a) for stating the same claim

that is pending before the Commission in EEOC Appeal No. 01970995.

The agency properly dismissed the remainder of allegation 4 (alleging

improper complaint processing) for failing to state a claim pursuant

to �1614.107(a).

The agency's decision dismissing allegations 1 - 3 is VACATED and

we REMAND allegations 1 - 3 to the agency for further processing in

accordance with this decision and applicable regulations. The agency's

decision dismissing allegation 4 is AFFIRMED.

ORDER

The agency shall supplement the record with evidence showing if and

when the selections at issue in allegations 1 - 3 were posted on a

bulletin board. Thereafter the agency shall determine if appellant

timely contacted an EEO Counselor regarding allegations 1 - 3. Within 30

days of the date this decision becomes final, the agency shall issue

a new decision dismissing the remanded allegations or issue a letter

to appellant accepting the remanded allegations for investigation.

The agency shall submit a copy of the decision dismissing the remanded

allegations or a copy of the letter to appellant accepting the remanded

allegations for investigation, to the Compliance Officer as referenced

herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0993)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file

a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the

date you filed your complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the

Commission, until such time as the agency issues its final decision

on your complaint. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE

DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 3, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations