Michael D. Scott, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 14, 2001
01a00098 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 14, 2001)

01a00098

03-14-2001

Michael D. Scott, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Michael D. Scott v. United States Postal Service

01A00098

03-14-01

.

Michael D. Scott,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A00098

Agency No. 1-H-351-0057-99

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of

the agency concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Complainant received the final agency decision

on September 14, 1999. The appeal was postmarked on September 19, 1999.

Accordingly, the appeal is timely pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402(a),

and is accepted in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed complainant's

complaint on the grounds that he failed to seek EEO counseling in a

timely fashion.

BACKGROUND

The record indicates that on March 26, 1999, the complainant requested

forms for the agency's Leave Sharing Program. According to the

complainant, he needed six weeks leave to recuperate from major back

surgery, but had only accrued three weeks leave, thereby necessitating

the request for donated annual leave. Concurrent with his request for

donated annual leave, complainant also requested advance sick leave. The

agency responded to the complainant's donated leave request, but no action

was taken on complainant's advance leave request until his request was

denied on May 21, 1999. Complainant was notified of the denial verbally,

and in a letter dated May 26, 1999. Complainant then contacted an EEO

counselor on May 26, 1999, alleging discrimination on the basis of his

race (Black). Specifically, he alleged that his request for advance

sick leave was denied.

In its final decision dated September 10, 1999, the agency dismissed

complainant's claim on the grounds that he sought EEO counseling in an

untimely manner. The agency argued that complainant became aware that

his request for advance leave was denied on March 26, 1999.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states that the agency

shall dismiss a complaint that fails to comply with the applicable

time limits contained in �� 1614.105, 1614.106 and 1614.204(c), unless

the agency extends the time limits in accordance with �1614.604(c).

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) provides that an aggrieved

person must initiate contact with an EEO counselor within forty-five

(45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or,

in the case of a personnel action, within 45 days of the effective date

of the action. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(2) allows the

agency or the Commission to extend the time limit if the complainant can

establish that he was not aware of the time limit, that he did not know

and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or

personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence he was prevented

by circumstances beyond his control from contacting the EEO counselor

withing the time limit, or for other reasons considered sufficient by

the agency or Commission.

Both the agency and the complainant characterized March 26, 1999, as

the date of the alleged discriminatory incident. However, a review of

the record establishes that complainant merely requested the paperwork

for the agency's Leave Sharing Program on that date. There was no

evidence that the agency took any adverse personnel action relevant to

this appeal prior to May 21, 1999, the date the application for advance

sick leave was denied. Further, the record indicates that complainant

was not actually notified that his request for advance leave would be

denied until May 26th. Therefore, complainant's contact with the EEO

counselor was timely.

CONCLUSION

The Commission finds that the instant complaint was improperly dismissed.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision is REVERSED. The complaint

is hereby REMANDED for further processing in accordance with the Order

below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____03-14-01______________

Date