0120072195
11-24-2009
Michael D. Kimble, Complainant, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Transportation Security Administration), Agency.
Michael D. Kimble,
Complainant,
v.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security,
(Transportation Security Administration),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120072195
Agency No. HS06TSA001927
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated
February 22, 2007, dismissing complainant's complaint for failure to
state a claim is improper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). In his
complaint dated September 5, 2006, complainant, a Lead Transportation
Security Officer with the Louis Armstrong International Airport located
in New Orleans, Louisiana, alleged discrimination based on disability
(back and right leg injury) when: (1) on April 6, 2006, his request
for reasonable accommodation was denied; (2) on April 13, 2006, he was
placed on administrative leave from his position as a Lead Transportation
Security Officer; and (3) on June 1, 2006, he was terminated from his
position as a Lead Transportation Security Officer.
In its decision, the agency dismissed the complaint on the grounds of
failure to state a claim. The agency determined that complainant's claim
of disability discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act was preempted
by the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA).
The Commission finds that it has jurisdiction over the complaint at
issue. The ATSA does not divest the Commission of jurisdiction over
complaints brought by security screeners against the agency under
the Rehabilitation Act or other statutes the Commission enforces.
While Congress gave the agency broad authority to establish terms and
conditions of employment for security screeners, that authority does not
include complete exemption from � 501 of the Rehabilitation Act and the
other employment discrimination laws. Chapman v. Department of Homeland
Security, EEOC Appeal No. 0120051049 (August 6, 2008), request for
reconsideration denied, EEOC Request No. 0520080805 (December 11, 2008);
Adams v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 0120054463
(August 31, 2007); Getzlow v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC
Appeal No. 0120053286 (June 26, 2007), request for reconsideration
denied, EEOC Request No. 0520070839 (October 12, 2007). Accordingly,
the Commission has authority to hear complaints under the Rehabilitation
Act involving security screener positions. Id.
In Getzlow, the Commission found that the complainant must show that
he meets the ATSA-mandated standards in order to be qualified under
the Rehabilitation Act. Getzlow, EEOC Appeal No. 0120053286. Not all
ATSA-mandated standards will conflict with the Rehabilitation Act. Id.
However, if a conflict exists between the two standards, the disputed
standard will supersede any Rehabilitation Act requirements to the
contrary. Id. In the instant matter, complainant is not challenging
an ATSA-mandated qualification standard. Rather, he was alleging that
he was discriminatorily denied reasonable accommodation, placed in
administrative leave, and was terminated from his position.
Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's
complaint is REVERSED. The complaint is hereby REMANDED to the agency for
further processing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below
ORDER (E0408)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar
days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall
be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,
DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,
and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.
If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant
may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action
to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following
an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,
1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant
has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in
accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil
Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).
If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of
the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1208)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request
to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
11/24/09
__________________
Date
2
0120072195
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013