Maureen Donnelly, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 7, 2001
01A13121_r (E.E.O.C. Sep. 7, 2001)

01A13121_r

09-07-2001

Maureen Donnelly, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Maureen Donnelly v. Department of Transportation

01A13121

September 7, 2001

.

Maureen Donnelly,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A13121

Agency No. DOT-1-01-1050

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's March 13, 2001

decision dismissing complainant's complaint was proper pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Complainant alleges that she was discriminated

against on the bases of sex and reprisal, when (1) the agency mislead

her and concealed relevant information during settlement agreement

discussions; (2) she was involuntarily reassigned to Andrews Tower;

and (3) she was transferred from Syracuse to appease the men in the

facility where she was originally located because she was perceived

as a troublemaker. The agency dismissed the complaint finding that it

states the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the

agency or Commission.

Complainant appears to be attempting to avoid compliance with the

settlement agreement. However, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(a), any

settlement agreement knowingly and voluntarily agreed to by the parties,

reached at any stage of the complaint process, shall be binding on

both parties. Therefore, complainant's attempt to avoid the settlement

agreement does not state a claim and is properly dismissed pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). Complainant's claim regarding being misled

about the settlement agreement was considered in Donnelly v. Department

of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. 01A06037 (January 8, 2001), req. for

recon. denied, EEOC Request No. 05a10289 (May 7, 2001). Furthermore, we

find that complainant is attempting to claim that the agency's actions

in breach of the agreement were motivated by discrimination. We find,

however, that alleging that a discriminatory motive applies to certain

actions does not raise a separate, different claim since the same actions

are being challenged.

The agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED

for reasons set forth herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 7, 2001

__________________

Date